Risk of Treatment Escalation in Recipients vs Nonrecipients of Spinal Manipulation for Musculoskeletal Cervical Spine Disorders: An Analysis of Insurance Claims

Author(s):  
Brian R. Anderson ◽  
W. Steve McClellan ◽  
Cynthia R. Long
1996 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 729-746
Author(s):  
James Rainville ◽  
Jerry B. Sobel ◽  
Robert J. Banco ◽  
Harvey L. Levine ◽  
Lisa Childs

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
David G. Malone ◽  
Nevan G. Baldwin ◽  
Frank J. Tomecek ◽  
Christopher M. Boxell ◽  
Steven E. Gaede ◽  
...  

Object The authors report a series of 22 patients in whom major complications developed after cervical spinal manipulation therapy (CSMT). A second objective was to estimate the regional incidence of these complications and to compare it with the very low incidences reported in the literature. Methods During a 5-year period, practioners at a single group neurosurgical practice in Tulsa, Oklahoma, treated 22 patients, who were markedly worse during, or immediately after, CSMT. The details of these cases are reported. The 1995 US Government National Census was used to define the regional referral population for Tulsa. The published data regarding the incidence of serious CSMT-related complications and the rate of CSMTs undertaken nationally were used to estimate the expected number of CSMT-related complications in the authors' region. The number (22 cases) reported in this series was used to estimate the actual regional incidence. Complications in the series included radiculopathy (21 cases), myelopathy (11 cases), Brown–Séquard syndrome (two cases), and vertebral artery (VA) occlusion (one case). Twenty-one patients underwent surgery. Poor outcomes were observed in three, outcome was unchanged in one, and 17 improved. The number of patients in this series exceeded the expected number for the region. Conclusions Cervical spinal manipulation therapy may worsen preexisting cervical disc herniation or cause disc herniation resulting in radiculopathy, myelopathy, or VA compression. In cases of cervical spondylosis, CSMT may also worsen preexisting myelopathy or radiculopathy. Manipulation of the cervical spine may also be associated with higher complication rates than previously reported.


Spine ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Wright ◽  
Tom G. Mayer ◽  
Robert J. Gatchel

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Otsudo ◽  
Kiyokazu Akasaka ◽  
Hiroshi Hattori ◽  
Yuki Hasebe ◽  
Akihiro Tamura ◽  
...  

Objective. The study used a 3D digitizer to determine three-dimensional motion analysis of the 2nd cervical (C2) spinous process at end range cervical rotation with the scapula in different positions. Methods. 30 healthy adults participated in this study. Different scapula positions were adopted bilaterally and positioned passively at normal resting, depression, adduction, and abduction. Under each scapula position, bilateral end range cervical rotation and displacement of the C2 spinous process were analyzed by a 3D digitizer. Results. Displacement of the C2 spinous process relative to the occiput was significantly correlated with range of cervical rotation under all scapular positions (p<0.05). However, there were no significant differences between end range cervical rotation and displacement of the C2 spinous process relative to the occiput in any scapular position. Conclusion. These results suggest that measurement of upper cervical mobility using the 3D digitizer is a reliable method that holds promise in the evaluation of people with cervical spine disorders.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 145-157
Author(s):  
Jibran Ahmed Khan ◽  
Vipin Kumar Pandey

The main aim of this review article is to identify the evidence-based diagnosis and physiotherapy management of musculoskeletal disorder of cervical spine. Neck pain from cervical spine disorders is the most common cause of musculoskeletal disorders. Neck pain can exist alone or with the presence of upper-extremity symptoms. Key words: Neck Pain, Cervical Spine, Joint mobilization, Massage.


Spine ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 1017-1022
Author(s):  
JIRÍ DVORÁK ◽  
B. JANSSEN ◽  
D. GROB

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document