Sleep-stage scoring in the rat using a support vector machine

2008 ◽  
Vol 168 (2) ◽  
pp. 524-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelly Crisler ◽  
Michael J. Morrissey ◽  
A. Michael Anch ◽  
David W. Barnett
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zilu Liang ◽  
Mario Alberto Chapa-Martell

Consumer wearable activity trackers, such as Fitbit are widely used in ubiquitous and longitudinal sleep monitoring in free-living environments. However, these devices are known to be inaccurate for measuring sleep stages. In this study, we develop and validate a novel approach that leverages the processed data readily available from consumer activity trackers (i.e., steps, heart rate, and sleep metrics) to predict sleep stages. The proposed approach adopts a selective correction strategy and consists of two levels of classifiers. The level-I classifier judges whether a Fitbit labeled sleep epoch is misclassified, and the level-II classifier re-classifies misclassified epochs into one of the four sleep stages (i.e., light sleep, deep sleep, REM sleep, and wakefulness). Best epoch-wise performance was achieved when support vector machine and gradient boosting decision tree (XGBoost) with up sampling were used, respectively at the level-I and level-II classification. The model achieved an overall per-epoch accuracy of 0.731 ± 0.119, Cohen's Kappa of 0.433 ± 0.212, and multi-class Matthew's correlation coefficient (MMCC) of 0.451 ± 0.214. Regarding the total duration of individual sleep stage, the mean normalized absolute bias (MAB) of this model was 0.469, which is a 23.9% reduction against the proprietary Fitbit algorithm. The model that combines support vector machine and XGBoost with down sampling achieved sub-optimal per-epoch accuracy of 0.704 ± 0.097, Cohen's Kappa of 0.427 ± 0.178, and MMCC of 0.439 ± 0.180. The sub-optimal model obtained a MAB of 0.179, a significantly reduction of 71.0% compared to the proprietary Fitbit algorithm. We highlight the challenges in machine learning based sleep stage prediction with consumer wearables, and suggest directions for future research.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Vasilevska ◽  
K Schlaaf ◽  
H Dobrowolny ◽  
G Meyer-Lotz ◽  
HG Bernstein ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-280
Author(s):  
Agus Setiyono ◽  
Hilman F Pardede

It is now common for a cellphone to receive spam messages. Great number of received messages making it difficult for human to classify those messages to Spam or no Spam.  One way to overcome this problem is to use Data Mining for automatic classifications. In this paper, we investigate various data mining techniques, named Support Vector Machine, Multinomial Naïve Bayes and Decision Tree for automatic spam detection. Our experimental results show that Support Vector Machine algorithm is the best algorithm over three evaluated algorithms. Support Vector Machine achieves 98.33%, while Multinomial Naïve Bayes achieves 98.13% and Decision Tree is at 97.10 % accuracy.


2011 ◽  
Vol 131 (8) ◽  
pp. 1495-1501
Author(s):  
Dongshik Kang ◽  
Masaki Higa ◽  
Hayao Miyagi ◽  
Ikugo Mitsui ◽  
Masanobu Fujita ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ryoichi ISAWA ◽  
Tao BAN ◽  
Shanqing GUO ◽  
Daisuke INOUE ◽  
Koji NAKAO

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document