signature verification
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1548
(FIVE YEARS 254)

H-INDEX

54
(FIVE YEARS 7)

2022 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-109
Author(s):  
Jindal et al. ◽  

A signature is a handwritten representation that is commonly used to validate and recognize the writer individually. An automated verification system is mandatory to verify the identity. The signature essentially displays a variety of dynamics and the static characteristics differ with time and place. Many scientists have already found different algorithms to boost the signature verification system function extraction point. The paper is aimed at multiplying two different ways to solve the problem in digital, manual, or some other means of verifying signatures. The various characteristics of the signature were found through the most adequately implemented methods of machine learning (support vector and decision tree). In addition, the characteristics were listed after measuring the effects. An experiment was performed in various language databases. More precision was obtained from the feature.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 378
Author(s):  
Enrique Cantó Navarro ◽  
Rafael Ramos Lara ◽  
Mariano López García

This paper describes three different approaches for the implementation of an online signature verification system on a low-cost FPGA. The system is based on an algorithm, which operates on real numbers using the double-precision floating-point IEEE 754 format. The double-precision computations are replaced by simpler formats, without affecting the biometrics performance, in order to permit efficient implementations on low-cost FPGA families. The first approach is an embedded system based on MicroBlaze, a 32-bit soft-core microprocessor designed for Xilinx FPGAs, which can be configured by including a single-precision floating-point unit (FPU). The second implementation attaches a hardware accelerator to the embedded system to reduce the execution time on floating-point vectors. The last approach is a custom computing system, which is built from a large set of arithmetic circuits that replace the floating-point data with a more efficient representation based on fixed-point format. The latter system provides a very high runtime acceleration factor at the expense of using a large number of FPGA resources, a complex development cycle and no flexibility since it cannot be adapted to other biometric algorithms. By contrast, the first system provides just the opposite features, while the second approach is a mixed solution between both of them. The experimental results show that both the hardware accelerator and the custom computing system reduce the execution time by a factor ×7.6 and ×201 but increase the logic FPGA resources by a factor ×2.3 and ×5.2, respectively, in comparison with the MicroBlaze embedded system.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fadi Mohammad Alsuhimat ◽  
Fatma Susilawati Mohamad

The signature process is one of the most significant processes used by organizations to preserve the security of information and protect it from unwanted penetration or access. As organizations and individuals move into the digital environment, there is an essential need for a computerized system able to distinguish between genuine and forged signatures in order to protect people's authorization and decide what permissions they have. In this paper, we used Pre-Trained CNN for extracts features from genuine and forged signatures, and three widely used classification algorithms, SVM (Support Vector Machine), NB (Naive Bayes) and KNN (k-nearest neighbors), these algorithms are compared to calculate the run time, classification error, classification loss and accuracy for test-set consist of signature images (genuine and forgery). Three classifiers have been applied using (UTSig) dataset; where run time, classification error, classification loss and accuracy were calculated for each classifier in the verification phase, the results showed that the SVM and KNN got the best accuracy (76.21), while the SVM got the best run time (0.13) result among other classifiers, therefore the SVM classifier got the best result among the other classifiers in terms of our measures.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Saleem ◽  
Bence Kovari

In this paper, we propose an enhanced jk-nearest neighbor (jk-NN) classifier for online signature verification. After studying the algorithm's main parameters, we use four separate databases to present and evaluate each algorithm parameter. The results show that the proposed method can increase the verification accuracy by 0.73-10% compared to a traditional one class k-NN classifier. The algorithm has achieved reasonable accuracy for different databases, a 3.93% error rate when using the SVC2004 database, 2.6% for MCYT-100 database, 1.75% for the SigComp'11 database, and 6% for the SigComp'15 database.The proposed algorithm uses specifically chosen parameters and a procedure to pick the optimal value for K using only the signer's reference signatures, to build a practical verification system for real-life scenarios where only these signatures are available. By applying the proposed algorithm, the average error achieved was 8% for SVC2004, 3.26% for MCYT-100, 13% for SigComp'15, and 2.22% for SigComp'11.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Saleem ◽  
BenceKovari

Online signatures are one of the most commonly used biometrics. Several verification systems and public databases were presented in this field. This paper presents a combination of knearest neighbor and dynamic time warping algorithms as a verification system using the recently published DeepSignDB database. Our algorithm was applied on both finger and stylus input signatures which represent both office and mobile scenarios. The system was first tested on the development set of the database. It achieved an error rate of 6.04% for the stylus input signatures, 5.20% for the finger input signatures, and 6.00% for a combination of both types. The system was also applied to the evaluation set of the database and achieved very promising results, especially for finger input signatures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document