scholarly journals The effect of door opening on air-mixing in a positively pressurized room: implications for operating room air management during the COVID outbreak

2021 ◽  
pp. 102900
Author(s):  
Arup Bhattacharya ◽  
Ali Ghahramani ◽  
Ehsan Mousavi
Orthopedics ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. e991-e994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon C. Mears ◽  
Renee Blanding ◽  
Stephen M. Belkoff

Author(s):  
MC Lind ◽  
S Sadrizadeh ◽  
B Venås ◽  
P Sadeghian ◽  
C Wang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 631-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sasan Sadrizadeh ◽  
Jovan Pantelic ◽  
Max Sherman ◽  
Jordan Clark ◽  
Omid Abouali

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke Reardon ◽  
Tricia Blalock

Background Operating room (OR) foot traffic is a contributing factor in the development of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Operating room door openings have been shown to increase bacterial counts in the OR, contributing to the risk of PJI. Because PJI is a costly and challenging complication, understanding door opening behavior is essential to minimize potential of PJI. Methods An observational study was conducted to evaluate OR foot traffic patterns for total knee and hip arthroplasties in a non-academic facility. Sixteen surgeries by 6 different surgeons were observed, 10 inpatient total hip arthroplasties (THA) and 6 inpatient total knee arthroplasties (TKA). OR traffic was monitored and recorded by counting the number of door openings, noting the timing of door openings, detailing personnel entering/exiting, and documenting the door used and the duration of each procedure. Results The average number of door openings for all cases during the possible contamination period was 73.4, and the average case length was 147 minutes. Sixty-four percent of traffic occurred from the time sterile trays were open to the incision being made and 36% of traffic occurred from incision to wound closure. Conclusion Managing door openings in the OR is a modifiable risk factor associated with PJI. From incision to closure, nurses and medical supply representatives were the largest contributors to OR foot traffic during TJA procedures. Understanding uring TJA will allow for the implementation of effective strategies to reduce OR foot traffic. 


Orthopedics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-72
Author(s):  
Liang Xiong ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Tao Xiao

Author(s):  
Kevin M. Taaffe ◽  
Robert W. Allen ◽  
Lawrence D. Fredendall ◽  
Marisa Shehan ◽  
Mary Grace Stachnik ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To identify factors that increase the microbial load in the operating room (OR) and recommend solutions to minimize the effect of these factors. Design: Observation and sampling study. Setting: Academic health center, public hospitals. Methods: We analyzed 4 videotaped orthopedic surgeries (15 hours in total) for door openings and staff movement. The data were translated into a script denoting a representative frequency and location of movements for each OR team member. These activities were then simulated for 30 minutes per trial in a functional operating room by the researchers re-enacting OR staff-member roles, while collecting bacteria and fungi using settle plates. To test the hypotheses on the influence of activity on microbial load, an experimental design was created in which each factor was tested at higher (and lower) than normal activity settings for a 30-minute period. These trials were conducted in 2 phases. Results: The frequency of door opening did not independently affect the microbial load in the OR. However, a longer duration and greater width of door opening led to increased microbial load in the OR. Increased staff movement also increased the microbial load. There was a significantly higher microbial load on the floor than at waist level. Conclusions: Movement of staff and the duration and width of door opening definitely affects the OR microbial load. However, further investigation is needed to determine how the number of staff affects the microbial load and how to reduce the microbial load at the surgical table.


Author(s):  
J. D. Shelburne ◽  
Peter Ingram ◽  
Victor L. Roggli ◽  
Ann LeFurgey

At present most medical microprobe analysis is conducted on insoluble particulates such as asbestos fibers in lung tissue. Cryotechniques are not necessary for this type of specimen. Insoluble particulates can be processed conventionally. Nevertheless, it is important to emphasize that conventional processing is unacceptable for specimens in which electrolyte distributions in tissues are sought. It is necessary to flash-freeze in order to preserve the integrity of electrolyte distributions at the subcellular and cellular level. Ideally, biopsies should be flash-frozen in the operating room rather than being frozen several minutes later in a histology laboratory. Electrolytes will move during such a long delay. While flammable cryogens such as propane obviously cannot be used in an operating room, liquid nitrogen-cooled slam-freezing devices or guns may be permitted, and are the best way to achieve an artifact-free, accurate tissue sample which truly reflects the in vivo state. Unfortunately, the importance of cryofixation is often not understood. Investigators bring tissue samples fixed in glutaraldehyde to a microprobe laboratory with a request for microprobe analysis for electrolytes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document