scholarly journals Lateral trunk lean explains variation in dynamic knee joint load in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 591-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Hunt ◽  
T.B. Birmingham ◽  
D. Bryant ◽  
I. Jones ◽  
J.R. Giffin ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Luiz Fernando Approbato Selistre ◽  
Glaucia Helena Gonçalves ◽  
Fernando Augusto Vasilceac ◽  
Paula Regina Mendes da Silva Serrão ◽  
Theresa Helissa Nakagawa ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 888-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.F. Moyer ◽  
T.B. Birmingham ◽  
B.M. Chesworth ◽  
C.O. Kean ◽  
J.R. Giffin

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitor Ferreira ◽  
Rita Simões ◽  
Rui Soles Gonçalves ◽  
Leandro Machado ◽  
Paulo Roriz

Abstract Background Lateral wedge insoles are traditionally used to reduce the adduction moment that crosses the knee during walking in people with medial knee osteoarthritis. However, the best degree to reduce knee joint load is not yet well established. Methods Electronic databases were searched from their inception until May 2017. Included studies reported on the immediate biomechanical effects of different degrees of lateral wedge insoles during walking in people with knee osteoarthritis. The main measures of interest relating to the biomechanics were the first and second peak of external knee adduction moment and knee adduction angular impulse. For the comparison of the biomechanical effects of different degrees of insoles, the studies were divided in three subgroups: insoles with a degree higher than 0° and equal to or lower than 5°; insoles higher than 5° and equal to or lower than 9°; and insoles higher than 9°. Eligible studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Results Fifteen studies with a total of 415 participants met all eligibility criteria and were included in the final review and meta-analysis. The overall effect suggests that lateral wedge insoles resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the first peak (standardized mean difference [SMD] –0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] –0.36, − 0.13; P < 0.001), second peak (SMD –0.26 [95% CI –0.48, − 0.04]; P = 0.02) and knee adduction angular impulse (SMD –0.17 [95% CI –0.31, − 0.03]; P = 0.02). The test of subgroups found no statistically significant differences. Conclusion Systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that lateral wedge insoles cause an overall slight reduction in the biomechanical parameters. Higher degrees do not show higher reductions than lower degrees. Prior analysis of biomechanical parameters may be a valid option for selecting the optimal angle of wedge that best fits in knee osteoarthritis patients with the lowest possible degree.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Calvin T. F. Tse ◽  
Michael B. Ryan ◽  
Jason Dien ◽  
Alex Scott ◽  
Michael A. Hunt

Abstract Background Lateral wedge insoles (LWI), standalone or with medial arch support (supported-LWI), have been thoroughly investigated for their effects on modifying gait biomechanics for people with knee osteoarthritis. However, plantar pressure distribution between these insole types has not been investigated and could provide insight towards insole prescription with concomitant foot symptoms taken into consideration. Methods In a sample of healthy individuals (n = 40), in-shoe plantar pressure was measured during walking with LWI, with or without medial arch support (variable- and uniform-stiffness designs), and a flat control insole condition. Pressure data from the plantar surface of the foot were divided into seven regions: medial/lateral rearfoot, midfoot, medial/central/lateral forefoot, hallux. Plantar pressure outcomes assessed were the medial-lateral pressure index (MLPI) for the whole foot, and the peak pressure, pressure-time integral (PTI), and contact area in each plantar region. Comfort in each insole condition was rated as a change relative to the flat control insole condition. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were calculated to compare the plantar pressure outcomes between insole conditions. Results Regionally, medial rearfoot and forefoot pressure were reduced by all wedged insoles, with the variable-stiffness supported-wedge showing greater reductions than the standalone wedge. Lateral rearfoot and forefoot pressure were reduced by both supported-LWI, but unchanged by the standalone wedge. In the midfoot, the standalone wedge maintained pressure but reduced regional contact area, while both supported-LWI increased midfoot pressure and contact area. All LWI increased the MLPI, indicating a lateral shift in plantar pressure distribution throughout the weightbearing phase of gait. Comfort ratings were not significantly different between insole conditions. Conclusions Regional differences in plantar pressure may help determine an appropriate lateral wedge insole variation to avoid exacerbation of concomitant foot symptoms by minimizing pressure in symptomatic regions. Lateral shifts in plantar pressure distribution were observed in all laterally wedged conditions, including one supported-LWI that was previously shown to be biomechanically ineffective for modifying knee joint load distribution. Thus, shifts in foot centre of pressure may not be a primary mechanism by which LWI can modify knee joint load distribution for people with knee osteoarthritis.


2012 ◽  
Vol 64 (10) ◽  
pp. 1545-1553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milena Simic ◽  
Michael A. Hunt ◽  
Kim L. Bennell ◽  
Rana S. Hinman ◽  
Tim V. Wrigley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document