Teaching Bone Health: An Educational Quality Improvement Program to Create a Curriculum for Geriatric Medicine Fellows in Bone Densitometry and Metabolic Bone Disease

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 407
Author(s):  
Z. Rana ◽  
B.-T. Ngo ◽  
A. Dentino
2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 62-66
Author(s):  
Nathan K. Wool ◽  
Shannon Wilson ◽  
Alexander C.M. Chong ◽  
Bradley R. Dart

Introduction. Metabolic bone disease is a malady that causessignificant morbidity and mortality to a patient who has sustaineda fragility fracture. There is currently no protocol toprevent secondary fragility fracture at our institution. The objectiveof this study was to create an appropriate protocol forimplementing clinical pathways for physicians to diagnose andtreat osteoporosis and fragility fractures by educating patients. Methods. A multidisciplinary team created an appropriateprotocol that could be implemented in an inpatient setting.A thorough literature review was conducted to evaluatepotential barriers and efficacious methods of protocol design. Results. A bone health improvement protocol was developed.Any patient over the age of 50 who sustains a fracture from lowenergy trauma, such as a fall from standing or less, should beconsidered to place into this protocol. These patients receivededucation on metabolic bone disease, a prescription for highdose vitamin D therapy, and laboratory testing to determinethe etiology of their metabolic bone disease. Continuity of careof these patients with their primary care provider was providedfor further management of their metabolic bone disease andevaluation of their disease after discharged from the hospital. Conclusion. Comprehensive secondary prevention should consistof osteoporosis assessment and treatment together with afall risk assessment. With this protocol, secondary fragility fracturespotentially could be prevented. KS J Med 2017;10(3):62-66.


Author(s):  
Edgar Turner Overton

Upon completion of this chapter, the reader should be able to • Familiar with the concept that metabolic bone disease is a common manifestation of HIV infection leading to an increased risk of fracture. • The reader should also recognize key risk factors for metabolic bone disease and strategies to mitigate this risk....


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine A. Pembroke ◽  
Joanne Alfieri ◽  
Alain Biron ◽  
Carolyn Freeman ◽  
Tarek Hijal

Author(s):  
George A. Beyer ◽  
Karan Dua ◽  
Neil V. Shah ◽  
Joseph P. Scollan ◽  
Jared M. Newman ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction We evaluated the demographics, flap types, and 30-day complication, readmission, and reoperation rates for upper extremity free flap transfers within the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Materials and Methods Upper extremity free flap transfer patients in the NSQIP from 2008 to 2016 were identified. Complications, reoperations, and readmissions were queried. Chi-squared tests evaluated differences in sex, race, and insurance. The types of procedures performed, complication frequencies, reoperation rates, and readmission rates were analyzed. Results One-hundred-eleven patients were selected (mean: 36.8 years). Most common upper extremity free flaps were muscle/myocutaneous (45.9%) and other vascularized bone grafts with microanastomosis (27.9%). Thirty-day complications among all patients included superficial site infections (2.7%), intraoperative transfusions (7.2%), pneumonia (0.9%), and deep venous thrombosis (0.9%). Thirty-day reoperation and readmission rates were 4.5% and 3.6%, respectively. The mean time from discharge to readmission was 12.5 days. Conclusion Upper extremity free flap transfers could be performed with a low rate of 30-day complications, reoperations, and readmissions.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adodra Annika ◽  
Kouklinos Andreas ◽  
Julies Priscilla ◽  
Shaw Mathew ◽  
Jacobs Benjamin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document