Postoperative Symptom Distress of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Ambulatory Surgery Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 801-813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Odom-Forren ◽  
Deborah B. Reed ◽  
Carrell Rush
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. e47-e48
Author(s):  
Jan Odom-Forren ◽  
Mary K. Rayens ◽  
Paul Sloan ◽  
Scott Mair ◽  
Dawn Profit

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmud Ekram Ullah ◽  
Md Mushfiqur Rahman ◽  
Hashim Rabbi ◽  
Md Noor A Alam ◽  
Tapash Kumar Maitra

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been performed as outpatient procedure for many years. Few studies have been conducted with primary focus on patient acceptance and preferences in terms of safety and satisfaction. We tried to explore its feasibility in otherwise healthy individuals undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: Data from 250 patients with cholelithiasis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in BIRDEM General Hospital from April 2017 to June 2018 as ambulatory surgery (hospital stay d”23 Hours) with or without overnight stay were analyzed. Complications, admissions and readmissions, patient satisfaction and treatment expenditure were assessed. Results: Mean duration of hospital stay was 17.3 hours. Two patients had complications (deep port site infection) on 5th post-operative day after surgery. Only 2.4% patients required readmission while 9.2% patients had unplanned admission. Seventy six point four percent patients were highly satisfied with the procedure. Treatment cost was about 15% lower than routine inpatient operation. Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed as an outpatient procedure with a low rate of complications and admissions/readmissions. Patient acceptance in terms of satisfaction is high. Birdem Med J 2019; 9(2): 157-161


2010 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 328-331
Author(s):  
Jesús Martín Fernández ◽  
Alberto Jara Sánchez ◽  
M. Carmen Manzanares Campillo ◽  
Pablo Menéndez Sánchez ◽  
Virginia Muñoz Atienza ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 164 (7) ◽  
pp. 531-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennie M. Irizarry ◽  
Marsha H. Graham ◽  
Paul R. Cordts

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 564
Author(s):  
André Goulart ◽  
Margarida Delgado ◽  
Maria Conceição Antunes ◽  
João Braga dos Anjos

Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard procedure for the treatment of lithiasic gallblader pathology and acute cholecystitis. Whether or not it should be done as ambulatory surgery is still being discussed. The present study aims to analyze the quality and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy conducted by the Ambulatory Unit of Hospital de Braga and compare the results with those from other European surgical centers performing LC as ambulatory surgery.Material and Methods: Observational prospective study of patients submitted to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in ambulatory surgery during a period of 26 months. Data regarding patients’ demography, peri- and postoperative complications, surgical time, time in recovery room, and readmission rates was collected.Results: A total of 231 patients were subjected to Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the ambulatory unit with overnight stay (time to discharge less than 24 hours). Three patients presented with intra-operative complications, which needed conversion to laparotomy, and four patients were admitted after surgery. The mean time for the procedure was 58 minutes and the mean time for recovery was 19h19 minutes. Postoperative morbidity was 7.8% with 2 nonscheduled admission having occurred.Discussion: One of the controversies regarding laparoscopic cholecystectomy as an outpatient procedure is the need for overnight hospital surveillance. In our unit, we have started LC on an outpatient basis with an overnight stay. Using this protocol, over the past two years, we have operated 231 patients and our results show that this is a completely safe technique.Conclusions: Data from the study suggests that LC is a safe technique when performed in ambulatory practice, having similar results to other european surgical centers.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Supreeth Kumar Reddy Kunnuru ◽  
B. Kanmaniyan ◽  
Manuneethimaran Thiyagarajan ◽  
Balaji K. Singh ◽  
Nitesh Navrathan

Objectives. Upper abdominal symptoms are common in both gallstone disease and inflammatory disorders of gastroduodenum. To differentiate the causes of upper gastrointestinal symptoms due to gallstone and gastroduodenal disorders, upper gastrointestinal (UGI) scopy is a useful diagnostic tool. Our aim of study is to determine the efficacy of the preoperative UGI scopy and concurrent treatment of associated esophageal and gastric pathologies with symptomatic cholelithiasis in view of postoperative symptom reduction. Materials and Methods. This is a prospective study comprising 400 symptomatic cholelithiasis patients admitted in our institution. All patients underwent upper GI endoscopy (1–4 days) prior to cholecystectomy, and the findings were noted. Then, based on findings in UGI scopy, patients were grouped as group A (endoscopy normal) and group B (endoscopy with some findings). Group B patients were treated with medication, and both groups were operated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pain and other symptoms in the preoperative period and postoperative period were measured and compared in both groups. Results. After excluding 7 patients with significant endoscopy findings, we have included 400 patients who underwent laparoscopy cholecystectomy. In a total of 400 patients, median age of presentation was 47.3 and female to male ratio was 2.2 : 1. Endoscopy showed some pathological findings in 75.5% patients, and the commonest endoscopy finding was gastritis. On comparison of pain score in preoperative patients, pain score was high in group B patients ( p < 0.05 ). Pain reduction was significant in postoperative 1st, 4th, and 6th weeks in both groups ( p < 0.0005 ). In the same way, other symptoms other than pain were compared which shows postoperative symptom reduction is highly significant in group B patients. Conclusion. Clinical presentation of cholelithiasis and other upper GI diseases resemble each other. It is difficult to discriminate between upper GI symptoms due to cholelithiasis or any other upper GI conditions. Although UGI scopy is not recommended for all patients with cholelithiasis, it may be beneficial to do UGI scopy in certain cholelithiasis patients with atypical presentation to prevent atypical symptoms after surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document