scholarly journals Screening the Soul: Communication Regarding Spiritual Concerns Among Primary Care Physicians and Seriously Ill Patients Approaching the End of Life (312-A)

2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 461 ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 299-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay A. Dow ◽  
Robin K. Matsuyama ◽  
V. Ramakrishnan ◽  
Laura Kuhn ◽  
Elizabeth B. Lamont ◽  
...  

Purpose Many seriously ill patients with cancer do not discuss prognosis or advance directives (ADs), which may lead to inappropriate and/or unwanted aggressive care at the end of life. Ten years ago, patients with cancer said they would not like to discuss ADs with their oncologist but would be willing to discuss them with an admitting physician. We assessed whether this point of view still held. Patients and Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 75 consecutively admitted patients with cancer in the cancer inpatient service. Results Of those enrolled, 41% (31 of 75) had an AD. Nearly all (87%, 65 of 75) thought it acceptable to discuss ADs with the admitting physician with whom they had no prior relationship, and 95% (62 of 65) thought that discussing AD issues was very or somewhat important. Only 7% (5 of 75) had discussed ADs with their oncologist, and only 23% (16 of 70) would like to discuss ADs with their oncologist. When specifically asked which physician they would choose, 48% (36 of 75) of patients would prefer their oncologist, and 35% (26 of 75) would prefer their primary care physician. Conclusion Fewer than half of seriously ill patients with cancer admitted to an oncology service have an AD. Only 23% (16 of 70) would like to discuss their ADs with their oncologist but nearly all supported a policy of discussing ADs with their admitting physician. However, fully 48% (36 of 75) actually preferred to discuss advance directives with their oncologist if AD discussion was necessary. We must educate patients on why communicating their ADs is beneficial and train primary care physicians, house staff, hospitalists, and oncologists to initiate these difficult discussions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy Ellen Selman ◽  
Lisa Jane Brighton ◽  
Vicky Robinson ◽  
Rob George ◽  
Shaheen A. Khan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mary McKenzie ◽  
Kelly Vranas ◽  
Elizabeth Cooney ◽  
Tatiana Silva ◽  
Susan Metzger ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 12-15
Author(s):  
Devon Boydstun ◽  
Shandra Basil ◽  
JIll Porter ◽  
Anand Gupta

Background: The Patient Self Determination Act was passed in 1991 and requires healthcare facilities to present patients with information regarding advanced directives. Since that time, there has been no improvement in the number of patients reported to have had such discussions. Numerous barriers to these discussions exist both on the patient and provider side. This study aims to identify barriers to end of life discussions among providers in the primary care setting. Methods: The study population included practicing primary care physicians in the OhioHealth system. They were administered an anonymous questionnaire addressing demographic information and questions specific to end of life discussions and what barriers exist. Results: A majority of primary care physicians reported engaging in end of life discussions with their patients. A majority of physicians cited lack of time as a barrier to having these discussions. There was a statistically significant age difference among primary care physicians who reported they have end of life discussions with their patients and among these physicians there was a statistically significant increase in their level of comfort having these discussions. Conclusion: Primary care physicians further into their career reported having end of life discussions more frequently and felt more comfortable doing so. Additionally, physicians cite lack of time as the most common barrier to holding end of life discussions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document