scholarly journals Assessing the Preparatory Grief in Advanced Cancer Patients (PGAC) Instrument as an Independent Predictor of Distress in an American Population (S796)

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 457-458
Author(s):  
Maxwell Vergo ◽  
Jeanne Kestel ◽  
Jeremy Whyman ◽  
John Salsman ◽  
Spencer James
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxwell T. Vergo ◽  
Jeremy Whyman ◽  
Zhigang Li ◽  
Jeanne Kestel ◽  
Spencer L. James ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 225-225
Author(s):  
Maxwell Thomas Vergo ◽  
Jeremy D. Whyman ◽  
Jeanne Kestel ◽  
Christopher Rector

225 Background: Only 50% of cancer patients who screen positive on the Distress Thermometer accept referral to psychosocial resources and mainly for challenges coping with overwhelming emotional response to losses. The Preparatory Grief in Advanced Cancer (PGAC) instrument was shown to have significant associations with hopelessness, anxiety, and depression in a Greek population with favorable potential as a screening tool. We aimed to assess the use of the PGAC in a sample of American patients diagnosed with incurable cancer as a more efficient screening tool for patients who would benefit from additional psychosocial referrals. Methods: We conducted this survey with participants from Northwestern University in Chicago, IL. Participants were US citizens and >18 years old with an incurable cancer and no history of substance abuse or current psychiatric diagnosis. Patients were asked to complete a single survey composed of demographic data and scales including the PGAC, Distress Thermometer, HADS, ESAS and QOL. We used pair-wise correlation measurements, which included p-value measurements for testing whether the correlation coefficient was significantly different from 0. We then used pair-wise correlation coefficients to assess for p-value < 0.05 at different PGAC scores. Results: 53 patients were surveyed, of which 57% (30) were outpatients. The PGAC score was associated with the distress thermometer (R=0.74, p=<0.001), HADS (R=0.65, p=<0.01), and ESAS (R=0.49, p=<0.01) as well as inversely correlated with QOL score (R=-0.45, p=<0.001). Additionally, PGAC > 21 (p=0.02) was associated with elevated distress thermometer score (p=0.02) and elevated HADS scores (p=0.04). Conclusions: We tested the PGAC in an American population for the first time and found correlation between PGAC other validated measures (Distress Thermometer, ESAS, HADS, QOL) in an American population. We propose a PGAC cutoff of >21 to assess for preparatory grief due to its association with elevated scores on Distress and HADS scales above this threshold. This instrument may better identify patients struggling with coping who would benefit from additional support but further investigation is needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document