Compensatory Sweating after Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy for Primary Focal Hyperhidrosis In Children: Are there Patient-Related Risk Factors?

Author(s):  
Catarina Carvalho ◽  
Ana Sofia Marinho ◽  
Joana Barbosa-Sequeira ◽  
Mário Rui Correia ◽  
José Banquart-Leitão ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 154 (21) ◽  
pp. 825-833
Author(s):  
Zoltán Döbrönte ◽  
Mária Szenes ◽  
Beáta Gasztonyi ◽  
Lajos Csermely ◽  
Márta Kovács ◽  
...  

Introduction: Recent guidelines recommend routine pulse oximetric monitoring during endoscopy, however, this has not been the common practice yet in the majority of the local endoscopic units. Aims: To draw attention to the importance of the routine use of pulse oximetric recording during endoscopy. Method: A prospective multicenter study was performed with the participation of 11 gastrointestinal endoscopic units. Data of pulse oximetric monitoring of 1249 endoscopic investigations were evaluated, of which 1183 were carried out with and 66 without sedation. Results: Oxygen saturation less than 90% was observed in 239 cases corresponding to 19.1% of all cases. It occurred most often during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (31.2%) and proximal enteroscopy (20%). Procedure-related risk factors proved to be the long duration of the investigation, premedication with pethidine (31.3%), and combined sedoanalgesia with pethidine and midazolam (34.38%). The age over 60 years, obesity, consumption of hypnotics or sedatives, severe cardiopulmonary state, and risk factor scores III and IV of the American Society of Anestwere found as patient-related risk factors. Conclusion: To increase the safety of patients undergoing endoscopic investigation, pulse oximeter and oxygen supplementation should be the standard requirement in all of the endoscopic investigation rooms. Pulse oximetric monitoring is advised routinely during endoscopy with special regard to the risk factors of hypoxemia. Orv. Hetil., 2013, 154, 825–833.


Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 500-P
Author(s):  
MINGXIA YUAN ◽  
SHENYUAN YUAN ◽  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunmei Xie ◽  
De Chang ◽  
Linhai Li ◽  
Xiaohua Peng ◽  
Zhijian Ling ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-92
Author(s):  
Renata Giudice ◽  
Raffaele Izzo ◽  
Maria Virgina Manzi ◽  
Giampiero Pagnano ◽  
Mario Santoro ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110090
Author(s):  
Nicholas Mielke ◽  
Steven Johnson ◽  
Patrick Karabon ◽  
Amit Bahl

Objective: Thrombophlebitis associated with peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) is a poorly described complication in the literature. Given limited accuracy of current assessment tools and poor documentation in the medical record, the true incidence and relevance of this complication is misrepresented. We aimed to identify risk factors in the development of thrombophlebitis using an objective methodology coupling serial diagnostic ultrasound and clinical assessment. Methods: We conducted a single-site, prospective observational cohort study. Adult patients presenting to the emergency department that underwent traditionally placed PIVC insertion and were being hospitalized with an anticipated length of stay greater than 2 days were eligible participants. Using serial, daily ultrasound evaluations and clinical assessments via the phlebitis scale, we identified patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic thrombosis. The primary goal was to identify demographic, clinical, and IV related risk factors associated with thrombophlebitis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to identify risk factors for thrombophlebitis. Results: A total of 62 PIVCs were included between July and August 2020. About 54 (87.10%) developed catheter-related thrombosis with 22 (40.74%) of the thrombosed catheters were characterized as symptomatic. Multivariate cox regression demonstrated that catheter diameter relative to vein diameter greater than one-third [AHR = 5.41 (1.91, 15.4) p = 0.0015] and angle of distal tip of catheter against vein wall ⩾5° [AHR = 4.39 (1.39, 13.8) p = 0.0116] were associated with increased likelihood of thrombophlebitis. Conclusions: Our study found that the increased proportion of catheter relative to vein size and steeper catheter tip angle increased the risk of thrombophlebitis. Catheter size relative to vein size is a modifiable factor that should be considered when inserting PIVCs. Additional larger prospective investigations using objective methodologies are needed to further characterize complications in PIVCs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document