The effect of short-stem humeral component sizing on humeral bone stress

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 761-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Daniel G. Langohr ◽  
Jacob Reeves ◽  
Christopher P. Roche ◽  
Kenneth J. Faber ◽  
James A. Johnson
2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (5) ◽  
pp. 603-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Schnetzke ◽  
S. Rick ◽  
P. Raiss ◽  
G. Walch ◽  
M. Loew

Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of using an anatomical short-stem shoulder prosthesis to treat primary osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint. Patients and Methods A total of 66 patients (67 shoulders) with a mean age of 76 years (63 to 92) were available for clinical and radiological follow-up at two different timepoints (T1, mean 2.6 years, sd 0.5; T2, mean 5.3 years, sd 0.7). Postoperative radiographs were analyzed for stem angle, cortical contact, and filling ratio of the stem. Follow-up radiographs were analyzed for timing and location of bone adaptation (cortical bone narrowing, osteopenia, spot welds, and condensation lines). The bone adaptation was classified as low (between zero and three features of bone remodelling around the humeral stem) or high (four or more features). Results The mean Constant score improved significantly from 28.5 (sd 11.6) preoperatively to 75.5 (sd 8.5) at T1 (p < 0.001) and remained stable over time (T2: 76.6, sd 10.2). No stem loosening was seen. High bone adaptation was present in 42% of shoulders at T1, with a slight decrease to 37% at T2. Cortical bone narrowing and osteopenia in the region of the calcar decreased from 76% to 66% between T1 and T2. Patients with high bone adaptation had a significantly higher mean filling ratio of the stem at the metaphysis (0.60, sd 0.05 vs 0.55, sd 0.06; p = 0.003) and at the diaphysis (0.65 sd 0.05 vs 0.60 sd 0.05; p = 0.007). Cortical contact of the stem was also associated with high bone adaptation (14/25 shoulders, p = 0.001). The clinical outcome was not influenced by the radiological changes. Conclusion Total shoulder arthroplasty using a short-stem humeral component resulted in good clinical outcomes with no evidence of loosening. However, approximately 40% of the shoulders developed substantial bone loss in the proximal humerus at between four and seven years of follow-up. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:603–9.


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony A. Romeo ◽  
Robert J. Thorsness ◽  
Shelby A. Sumner ◽  
Reuben Gobezie ◽  
Evan S. Lederman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Amir Tavakoli ◽  
Gregory Spangenberg ◽  
Jacob M. Reeves ◽  
Kenneth J. Faber ◽  
G. Daniel G. Langohr

Author(s):  
Christopher Hadley ◽  
Michael J. Gutman ◽  
Meghan E. Bishop ◽  
Surena Namdari ◽  
Brandon J. Erickson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-181
Author(s):  
Marcelo Bighetti Toniollo ◽  
Mikaelly dos Santos Sá ◽  
Fernanda Pereira Silva ◽  
Giselle Rodrigues Reis ◽  
Ana Paula Macedo ◽  
...  

Rehabilitation with implant prostheses in posterior areas requires the maximum number of possible implants due to the greater masticatory load of the region. However, the necessary minimum requirements are not always present in full. This project analyzed the minimum principal stresses (TMiP, representative of the compressive stress) to the friable structures, specifically the vestibular face of the cortical bone and the vestibular and internal/lingual face of the medullary bone. The experimental groups were as follows: the regular splinted group (GR), with a conventional infrastructure on 3 regular-length Morse taper implants (4 × 11 mm); and the regular pontic group (GP), with a pontic infrastructure on 2 regular-length Morse taper implants (4 × 11 mm). The results showed that the TMiP of the cortical and medullary bones were greater for the GP in regions surrounding the implants (especially in the cervical and apical areas of the same region) but they did not reach bone damage levels, at least under the loads applied in this study. It was concluded that greater stress observed in the GP demonstrates greater fragility with this modality of rehabilitation; this should draw the professional's attention to possible biomechanical implications. Whenever possible, professionals should give preference to use of a greater number of implants in the rehabilitation system, with a focus on preserving the supporting tissue with the generation of less intense stresses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document