Using detrital zircons from late Permian to Triassic sedimentary rocks in the south-eastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt (NE China) to constrain the timing of the final closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean

2017 ◽  
Vol 144 ◽  
pp. 82-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhong-Biao Zhou ◽  
Fu-Ping Pei ◽  
Zhi-Wei Wang ◽  
Hua-Hua Cao ◽  
Wen-Liang Xu ◽  
...  
Minerals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 880
Author(s):  
Wilfried Winkler ◽  
Denise Bussien ◽  
Munktsengel Baatar ◽  
Chimedtseren Anaad ◽  
Albrecht von Quadt

Our study is aimed at reconstructing the Palaeozoic–early Mesozoic plate tectonic development of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt in central and southeast Mongolia (Gobi). We use sandstone provenance signatures including laser ablation U-Pb ages of detrital zircons, their epsilon hafnium isotope signatures, and detrital framework grain analyses. We adopt a well-established terran subdivision of central and southeastern Mongolia. However, according to their affinity and tectonic assemblage we group them into three larger units consisting of continental basement, rift-passive continental margin and arc elements, respectively. These are in today’s coordinates: (i) in the north the late Cambrian collage from which the later Mongol-Okhotsk and the Central Mongolia-Erguna mountain ranges resulted, (ii) in the south a heterogeneous block from which the South Mongolia-Xin’gan and Inner Mongolia-Xilin belts developed, and (iii) in between we still distinguish the intra-oceanic volcanic arc of the Gurvansayhan terrane. We present a model for paleotectonic development for the period from Cambrian to Jurassic, which also integrates findings from the Central Asian Orogenic Belt in China and Russia. This mobilistic model implies an interplay of rift and drift processes, ocean formation, oceanic subduction, basin inversion, collision and suture formation in space and time. The final assemblage of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt occurred in Early Jurassic.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Zhu ◽  
Yan Chen ◽  
Bo Wang ◽  
Stéphane Scaillet ◽  
Michel Faure ◽  
...  

<p><span>The Beishan Orogenic Belt plays an important role in understanding the Paleozoic tectonic evolution of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt and the final closure time of the Paleo-Asian Ocean. However, although numerous geochronologic, geochemical, and isotopic data have been</span> <span>obtained,</span><span> no consensus has been reached yet on the Early Permian tectonic setting for this region and, thus, the final closure time of the Paleo-Asian Ocean, mainly because of the nonuniqueness of the interpretations deduced from such data base. Therefore, other methods are urgently needed to provide more constraints from different perspectives. We present here a paleomagnetic study on the Gubaoquan doleritic dike swarm in the South Beishan area. Thermo-magnetic experiments and room-temperature hysteresis loops reveal that single-domain and multi-domain magnetite is the principal carrier of remanence. Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of studied dikes shows a horizontal magnetic foliation with a magnetic lineation generally parallel to the dikes’ strike. Plagioclase <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar dating result of one dolerite sample collected from the margin of a 10m-thick dike provides a cooling age at 300~284 Ma. Scanning electronic microscope observation coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry shows that the remanence carrier is mainly euhedral without evident chemical alteration nor secondary mineral formation. Characteristic remanent magnetizations are successfully isolated from twenty dikes, and pass baked contact test. According to <em>Deenen et al. </em>(2011) statistical criteria, the distribution of the remanence directions reflects the contribution from paleosecular variation of the geomagnetic field. Taking all data together, the Gubaoquan doleritic dike swarm probably preserves a primary remanence. Consequently, an Early Permian paleomagnetic pole for the South Beishan can be calculated at <em>λ</em> = 80.2°N, <em>φ</em> = 300.3°E, <em>A<sub>95</sub></em> = 5.3° and <em>N</em> = 20. Comparisons of this new result with published ones from neighboring blocks bring us following implications for the tectonic evolution of the SW CAOB: 1. Neither relative latitudinal movement nor relative rotation can be paleomagnetically detected among Yili, Turpan-Hami, and South Beishan since the Early Permian. 2. Significant relative rotations have taken place between South Junggar and Tarim with respect to South Beishan-Turpan-Hami-Yili, respectively, since the Early Permian, corresponding to large-magnitude strike-slip displacements along mega-shear zones. 3. No obvious relative latitudinal movement has occurred between South Beishan and its neighboring blocks (Tarim, South Junggar, Yili, Turpan-Hami, and Dunhuang) since the Early Permian, combined with other evident, suggesting that the Paleo-Asian Ocean probably have closed before the Early Permian, and South Beishan was in a rift setting in the Early Permian.</span></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document