Designing an Intimate Partner Violence Screening Program for Surgical Residents in Trauma

Author(s):  
Hannah Decker ◽  
Marisa E. Schwab ◽  
Jane Wang ◽  
Micaela L. Rosser ◽  
Vagn Petersen ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 088626052199746
Author(s):  
Kirsten J. H. Das ◽  
Sarah Peitzmeier ◽  
Iman K. Berrahou ◽  
Jennifer Potter

Transgender patients are at elevated risk of intimate partner violence (IPV), but national guidelines do not recommend routine screening for this population. This paper explores the feasibility and effectiveness of routine IPV screening of transgender patients in a primary care setting by describing an existing screening program and identifying factors associated with referral and engagement in IPV-related care for transgender patients. An IPV “referral cascade” was created for 1,947 transgender primary care patients at an urban community health center who were screened for IPV between January 1, 2014 to May 31, 2016: (a) Of those screening positive, how many were referred? (b) Of those referred, how many engaged in IPV-specific care within 3 months? Logistic regression identified demographic correlates of referral and engagement. Of the 1,947 transgender patients screened for IPV, 227 screened positive. 110/227 (48.5%) were referred to either internal or external IPV-related services. Of those referred to on-site services, 65/103 (63.1%) had an IPV-related appointment within 3 months of a positive screen. IPV referral was associated with being assigned male at birth (AMAB) versus assigned female at birth (AFAB) (AOR = 2.69, 95% CI 1.52, 4.75) and with nonbinary, rather than binary, gender identity (AOR = 2.07, 95%CI 1.09, 3.73). Engagement in IPV-related services was not associated with any measured demographic characteristics. Similar to published rates for cisgender women, half of transgender patients with positive IPV screens received referrals and two-thirds of those referred engaged in IPV-specific care. These findings support routine IPV screening and referral for transgender patients in primary care settings. Provider training should focus on how to ensure referrals are made for all transgender patients who screen positive for IPV, regardless of gender identity, to ensure the benefits of screening accrue equally for all patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (9) ◽  
pp. 1000-1013
Author(s):  
Katherine M. Jones ◽  
Michele M. Carter ◽  
Ann L. Bianchi ◽  
Robert J. Zeglin ◽  
Jay Schulkin

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 520-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Rodriguez ◽  
Jan Shoultz ◽  
Erin Richardson

Little is known about factors associated with health care screening of intimate partner violence (IPV) for Latinas during pregnancy. This study builds on current research examining IPV-associated outcomes among Latinas by analyzing 210 pregnant Latina responses to a patient survey. A multivariate logistic regression model examined factors associated with being screened for IPV. One-third of pregnant women reported being screened for IPV. Factors related to being screened for IPV are reported and did not match those associated with having experienced IPV. While most pregnant Latinas were not screened for IPV, having systematic processes in place for IPV screening and fostering good patient–provider communication may facilitate identification of IPV. Having a greater awareness of the risk factors associated with IPV may also provide cues for clinicians to better address the issue of IPV.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document