What is the Accuracy of the ACS-NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Emergency Abdominal Surgery? A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 268 ◽  
pp. 300-307
Author(s):  
Cameron James Parkin ◽  
Peter Moritz ◽  
Olivia Kirkland ◽  
Anthony Glover
2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (3) ◽  
pp. 818-824
Author(s):  
Sasha Vaziri ◽  
Joseph M. Abbatematteo ◽  
Max S. Fleisher ◽  
Alexander B. Dru ◽  
Dennis T. Lockney ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) online surgical risk calculator uses inherent patient characteristics to provide predictive risk scores for adverse postoperative events. The purpose of this study was to determine if predicted perioperative risk scores correlate with actual hospital costs.METHODSA single-center retrospective review of 1005 neurosurgical patients treated between September 1, 2011, and December 31, 2014, was performed. Individual patient characteristics were entered into the NSQIP calculator. Predicted risk scores were compared with actual in-hospital costs obtained from a billing database. Correlational statistics were used to determine if patients with higher risk scores were associated with increased in-hospital costs.RESULTSThe Pearson correlation coefficient (R) was used to assess the correlation between 11 types of predicted complication risk scores and 5 types of encounter costs from 1005 health encounters involving neurosurgical procedures. Risk scores in categories such as any complication, serious complication, pneumonia, cardiac complication, surgical site infection, urinary tract infection, venous thromboembolism, renal failure, return to operating room, death, and discharge to nursing home or rehabilitation facility were obtained. Patients with higher predicted risk scores in all measures except surgical site infection were found to have a statistically significant association with increased actual in-hospital costs (p < 0.0005).CONCLUSIONSPrevious work has demonstrated that the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator can accurately predict mortality after neurosurgery but is poorly predictive of other potential adverse events and clinical outcomes. However, this study demonstrates that predicted high-risk patients identified by the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator have a statistically significant moderate correlation to increased actual in-hospital costs. The NSQIP calculator may not accurately predict the occurrence of surgical complications (as demonstrated previously), but future iterations of the ACS universal risk calculator may be effective in predicting actual in-hospital costs, which could be advantageous in the current value-based healthcare environment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. S67
Author(s):  
H. Van der Hulst ◽  
J.W.T. Dekker ◽  
E. Bastiaannet ◽  
J. van der Bol ◽  
F. van den Bos ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Neel P. Chudgar ◽  
Shi Yan ◽  
Meier Hsu ◽  
Kay See Tan ◽  
Katherine D. Gray ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian M. Cusworth ◽  
Bradley A. Krasnick ◽  
Timothy M. Nywening ◽  
Cheryl A. Woolsey ◽  
Ryan C. Fields ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. 942-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sasha Vaziri ◽  
Jacob Wilson ◽  
Joseph Abbatematteo ◽  
Paul Kubilis ◽  
Saptarshi Chakraborty ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) universal Surgical Risk Calculator is an online decision-support tool that uses patient characteristics to estimate the risk of adverse postoperative events. Further validation of this risk calculator in the neurosurgical population is needed; therefore, the object of this study was to assess the predictive performance of the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in neurosurgical patients treated at a tertiary care center.METHODSA single-center retrospective review of 1006 neurosurgical patients treated in the period from September 2011 through December 2014 was performed. Individual patient characteristics were entered into the NSQIP calculator. Predicted complications were compared with actual occurrences identified through chart review and administrative quality coding data. Statistical models were used to assess the predictive performance of risk scores. Traditionally, an ideal risk prediction model demonstrates good calibration and strong discrimination when comparing predicted and observed events.RESULTSThe ACS NSQIP risk calculator demonstrated good calibration between predicted and observed risks of death (p = 0.102), surgical site infection (SSI; p = 0.099), and venous thromboembolism (VTE; p = 0.164) Alternatively, the risk calculator demonstrated a statistically significant lack of calibration between predicted and observed risk of pneumonia (p = 0.044), urinary tract infection (UTI; p < 0.001), return to the operating room (p < 0.001), and discharge to a rehabilitation or nursing facility (p < 0.001). The discriminative performance of the risk calculator was assessed using the c-statistic. Death (c-statistic 0.93), UTI (0.846), and pneumonia (0.862) demonstrated strong discriminative performance. Discharge to a rehabilitation facility or nursing home (c-statistic 0.794) and VTE (0.767) showed adequate discrimination. Return to the operating room (c-statistic 0.452) and SSI (0.556) demonstrated poor discriminative performance. The risk prediction model was both well calibrated and discriminative only for 30-day mortality.CONCLUSIONSThis study illustrates the importance of validating universal risk calculators in specialty-specific surgical populations. The ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator could be used as a decision-support tool for neurosurgical informed consent with respect to predicted mortality but was poorly predictive of other potential adverse events and clinical outcomes.


HPB ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. e157 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Madhavan ◽  
S.-L. Soong ◽  
S. Vishalkumar ◽  
W.W.L. Woon ◽  
J.K. Low ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 3 (14) ◽  
pp. 558-572
Author(s):  
Kelly Resende Alves ◽  
Ruth Silva Matos ◽  
Jacqueline Ramos de Andrade Antunes Gomes ◽  
Glayson Carlos Miranda Verner ◽  
Lauane Rocha Itacarambi ◽  
...  

Contexto: A TEV é uma complicação comum em pacientes hospitalizados. Assim, a estratificação do risco tromboembólico é essencial para minimizar complicações e otimizar a condição pré-operatória do paciente antes de cirurgias eletivas. Objetivo:Investigar a correlação entre o escore ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator e o TEV Safety Zone na avaliação ambulatorial pré-operatória do risco tromboembólico em cirurgias não cardíacas.Métodos: Estudo observacional transversal retrospectivo com análise de prontuários eletrônicos de pacientes atendidos em um ambulatório multidisciplinar de medicina e enfermagem perioperatória no período compreendido entre Janeiro e Dezembro de 2017. Correlacionou-se o escore de risco tromboembólico TEV Safety Zone já aplicado no ambulatório com o risco de tromboembolismo venoso obtido pela calculadora de risco ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator. Resultados:Foi coletada uma amostra de 416 prontuários. Destes, 197 (47,6%) resultaram em risco equivalente entre os dois escores e 219 divergiram nos resultados. Obteve-se um p<0,001 através do teste de Wilcoxon.Conclusões: Houve correlação entre o ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator e o TEV Safety Zone (p<0,001).


2020 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 82S-83S
Author(s):  
Brooke Thigpen ◽  
Carey Eppes ◽  
Jordan Schaumberg ◽  
Emily Johnson ◽  
Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document