Remote Longitudinal Inpatient Acute Stroke Care Via Telestroke

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant healthcare reorganizations, potentially striking standard medical care. We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute stroke care quality and clinical outcomes to detect healthcare system’s bottlenecks from a territorial point of view. Methods: Crossed-data analysis between a prospective nation-based mandatory registry of acute stroke, Emergency Medical System (EMS) records, and daily incidence of COVID-19 in Catalonia (Spain). We included all stroke code activations during the pandemic (March 15–May 2, 2020) and an immediate prepandemic period (January 26–March 14, 2020). Primary outcomes were stroke code activations and reperfusion therapies in both periods. Secondary outcomes included clinical characteristics, workflow metrics, differences across types of stroke centers, correlation analysis between weekly EMS alerts, COVID-19 cases, and workflow metrics, and impact on mortality and clinical outcome at 90 days. Results: Stroke code activations decreased by 22% and reperfusion therapies dropped by 29% during the pandemic period, with no differences in age, stroke severity, or large vessel occlusion. Calls to EMS were handled 42 min later, and time from onset to hospital arrival increased by 53 min, with significant correlations between weekly COVID-19 cases and more EMS calls (rho = 0.81), less stroke code activations (rho = −0.37), and longer prehospital delays (rho = 0.25). Telestroke centers were afflicted with higher reductions in stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, referrals to endovascular centers, and increased delays to thrombolytics. The independent odds of death increased (OR 1.6 [1.05–2.4], p 0.03) and good functional outcome decreased (mRS ≤2 at 90 days: OR 0.6 [0.4–0.9], p 0.015) during the pandemic period. Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Catalonia’s stroke system’s weakest points were the delay to EMS alert and a decline of stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, and interhospital transfers, mostly at local centers. Patients suffering an acute stroke during the pandemic period had higher odds of poor functional outcome and death. The complete stroke care system’s analysis is crucial to allocate resources appropriately.

Download Full-text

Acute Stroke Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Reduction in the Number of Admissions of Elderly Patients and Increase in Prehospital Delays

Cerebrovascular Diseases ◽

10.1159/000514140 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Gabriel Velilla-Alonso ◽

Andrés García-Pastor ◽

Ángela Rodríguez-López ◽

Ana Gómez-Roldós ◽

Antonio Sánchez-Soblechero ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Elderly Patients ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Time Course ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Group Data ◽

Radiological Data ◽

History Of ◽

Prehospital Delays

Introduction: We analyzed whether the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis affected acute stroke care in our center during the first 2 months of lockdown in Spain. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study. We collected demographic, clinical, and radiological data; time course; and treatment of patients meeting the stroke unit admission criteria from March 14 to May 14, 2020 (COVID-19 period group). Data were compared with the same period in 2019 (pre-COVID-19 period group). Results: 195 patients were analyzed; 83 in the COVID-19 period group, resulting in a 26% decline of acute strokes and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) admitted to our center compared with the previous year (p = 0.038). Ten patients (12%) tested positive for PCR SARS-CoV-2. The proportion of patients aged 65 years and over was lower in the COVID-19 period group (53 vs. 68.8%, p = 0.025). During the pandemic period, analyzed patients were more frequently smokers (27.7 vs. 10.7%, p = 0.002) and had less frequently history of prior stroke (13.3 vs. 25%, p = 0.043) or atrial fibrillation (9.6 vs. 25%, p = 0.006). ASPECTS score was lower (9 [7–10] vs. 10 [8–10], p = 0.032), NIHSS score was slightly higher (5 [2–14] vs. 4 [2–8], p = 0.122), onset-to-door time was higher (304 [93–760] vs. 197 [91.25–645] min, p = 0.104), and a lower proportion arrived within 4.5 h from onset of symptoms (43.4 vs. 58%, p = 0.043) during the COVID-19 period. There were no differences between proportion of patients receiving recanalization treatment (intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy) and in-hospital delays. Conclusion: We observed a reduction in the number of acute strokes and TIAs admitted during the COVID-19 period. This drop affected especially elderly patients, and despite a delay in their arrival to the emergency department, the proportion of patients treated with recanalization therapies was preserved.

Download Full-text

Effect of Acute Stroke Care Regionalization on Intravenous Alteplase Use in Two Urban Counties

Prehospital Emergency Care ◽

10.1080/10903127.2019.1679303 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 24 (4) ◽

pp. 505-514 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Prasanthi Govindarajan ◽

Stephen Shiboski ◽

Barbara Grimes ◽

Lawrence J. Cook ◽

David Ghilarducci ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Intravenous Alteplase

Download Full-text

Disabling stroke in persons already with a disability

Neurology ◽

10.1212/wnl.0000000000008964 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 94 (7) ◽

pp. 306-310 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Michael J. Young ◽

Robert W. Regenhardt ◽

Thabele M. Leslie-Mazwi ◽

Michael Ashley Stein

Keyword(s):

Clinical Practice ◽

Health Outcomes ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Care Delivery ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Clinical Practices ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Persons With Disabilities ◽

Stroke Research ◽

Scant Attention

Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide and a leading cause of adult disability worldwide. More than a third of individuals presenting with strokes are estimated to have a preexisting disability. Despite unprecedented advances in stroke research and clinical practice over the past decade, approaches to acute stroke care for persons with preexisting disability have received scant attention. Current standards of research and clinical practice are influenced by an underexplored range of biases that may hinder acute stroke care for persons with disability. These trends may exacerbate unequal health outcomes by rendering novel stroke therapies inaccessible to many persons with disabilities. Here, we explore the underpinnings and implications of biases involving persons with disability in stroke research and practice. Recent insights from bioethics, disability rights, and health law are explained and critically evaluated in the context of prevailing research and clinical practices. Allowing disability to drive decisions to withhold acute stroke interventions may perpetuate disparate health outcomes and undermine ethically resilient stroke care. Advocacy for inclusion of persons with disability in future stroke trials can improve equity in stroke care delivery.

Download Full-text

Review of upper limb ability assessments in acute stroke care, from a practice perspective

International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation ◽

10.12968/ijtr.2008.15.12.45424 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 15 (12) ◽

pp. 678-684

Author(s):

Tennille J Rowland ◽

Louise Gustafsson ◽

Robert D Henderson ◽

Merrill Turpin ◽

Stephen J Read

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Upper Limb ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Practice Perspective

Download Full-text

FP22-TU-01 Quality of acute stroke care in Thailand, a prospective multicenter countrywide study

Journal of the Neurological Sciences ◽

10.1016/s0022-510x(09)70380-6 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 285 ◽

pp. S91

Author(s):

Y. Nilanont ◽

S. Nidhinandana ◽

N. Suwanwela ◽

N. Poungvarin

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care

Download Full-text

Abstract 2197: Telestroke: Optimizing Access to Emergency Interventions in Acute Stroke Care

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.a2197 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Rayetta Johnson

Keyword(s):

Quality Improvement ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Health Care Providers ◽

Positive Impact ◽

Medical Center ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Nurse Specialist ◽

Care Providers ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Evidenced Based

Background and Issues: The burden of stroke in North Carolina is one of the highest in the nation (approximately 28,000 stroke hospitalizations from 2003-2007). The number and high costs of stroke have made it incumbent to improve the numbers of patients receiving effective treatment. There are two major barriers for treatment of acute stroke: time and access. The utilization of telestroke in community hospitals aids in decreasing these barriers by providing immediate access to a stroke neurologist. In order for telestroke to be successful, awareness and education regarding acute stroke care must be provided for health care providers as well as the communities. Thus, the development of a telestroke system requires nursing and medical expertise. The Primary Stroke Center Team at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center in Winston-Salem, N.C. implemented a telestroke network system (Intouch's Health's RP-7 Robotic system) in January of 2010 to provide 24/7 access to the medical center's acute stroke experts and the latest advancements in stroke interventions. There are eight hospitals in the network at the present time. Methods: Our team identified that many of the network hospital's staff are not experienced in taking care of a stroke patient and that a “roadmap” is useful to guide them in these steps.The stroke nurse specialist developed a quality improvement plan for the network hospitals which included: an evidence-based algorithm for patient care; stroke education, in particular, neurological assessment and tPA administration classes for the ED staff; quarterly meetings to provide outcome and feedback data with each network hospital; stroke awareness events for the community. Mock telestroke consults were also performed prior to “going live” with telestroke for each of the network hospitals. Of utmost importance is the early involvement and education of the EMS system in the respective county of the network hospital. The buy-in of EMS was found to be a key component in the success of the network. Finally, attention to customized quality improvement efforts for each of the facilities are required to accomplish integration into the telestroke network. Results: The data has been analyzed, and thus far, a 24% rate of tPA administration has been seen with our network hospitals (an increase from the 3.6% national average). Comparisons between each of the eight network hospitals' rates of administration of tPA prior to and after joining the network show a trend of increase (10%-40%). The effectiveness of the algorithm has also been explored by analysis of feedback and initial results have shown a positive impact. Conclusion: A combination of improving access to stroke neurologists in conjunction with a focus on improving the level of care via evidenced based stroke care teaching and implementation of algorithms at a network hospital is required for implementing and building a successful telestroke network.

Download Full-text