scholarly journals Total aortic arch replacement with a branched graft and limited circulatory arrest of the brain

2004 ◽  
Vol 128 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas T. Kouchoukos ◽  
Paolo Masetti
2005 ◽  
Vol 129 (5) ◽  
pp. 1207-1208
Author(s):  
Teruhisa Kazui ◽  
Abul Hasan Muhammad Bashar ◽  
Naoki Washiyama

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luchen Wang ◽  
Yunfeng Li ◽  
Yaojun Dun ◽  
Xiaogang Sun

Abstract Background: Total aortic arch replacement (TAR) with frozen elephant trunk (FET) requires hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) for 20 minutes, which increases the surgical risk. We invented an aortic balloon occlusion technique that requires 5 minutes of HCA on average to perform TAR with FET and investigated the possible merit of this new method in this study. Methods: This retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent TAR and FET (consisting of 130 cases of aortic balloon occlusion group and 230 cases of conventional group) in Fuwai Hospital between August 2017 and February 2019. In addition to the postoperative complications, the alterations of blood routine tests, alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) during the in-hospital stay were also recorded. Results: The 30-day mortality rates were similar between the aortic balloon occlusion group (4.6%) and the conventional group (7.8%, P = 0.241). Multivariate analysis showed aortic balloon occlusion reduced postoperative acute kidney injury (23.1% vs 35.7%, P = 0.013) and hepatic injury (12.3% vs 27.8%, P = 0.001), and maintained similar cost to patients (25.5 vs 24.9 kUSD, P = 0.298). We also found that AST was high during intensive care unit (ICU) stay and recovered to normal before discharge, while ALT was not as high as AST in ICU but showed a rising tendency before discharge. The platelet count showed a rising tendency on postoperative day 3 and may exceed the preoperative value before discharge. Conclusions: The aortic balloon occlusion achieved the surgical goal of TAR with FET with an improved recovery process during the in-hospital stay.


Aorta ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
pp. 121-124
Author(s):  
Ilaria Franzese ◽  
Giuseppe Petrilli ◽  
Giovanni Puppini ◽  
Daniela Bacich ◽  
Vincenzo Giambruno ◽  
...  

AbstractIn selected cases, the utilization of branched endografts for the treatment of aortic arch aneurysms could be a safe and advantageous alternative to high-risk procedures such as open total aortic arch replacement or hybrid arch repair. We present the case of a 70-year-old man with saccular aneurysm of a bovine aortic arch which was endovascularly treated using a double-branched custom-made aortic endoprosthesis based on the Relay NBS (Non-Bare Stent) Plus platform intended for zone 0 deployment. The postoperative clinical course was uneventful. The postoperative computed tomography scan showed a good result of the implant. The patient was discharged 6 days after the procedure.


Author(s):  
L. Kulyk ◽  
I. Protsyk ◽  
D. Beshley ◽  
A. Schnaidruk ◽  
V. Petsentii ◽  
...  

The total aortic arch replacement is one of the most technically demanding operations, the main risk of which is the intraoperative ischemic lesion of the brain. Despite progress, operating mortality associated with this operation, even at the most renowned specialized centers reaches 7.3%. An alternative to the classic “open” operation is aortic endoprosthesis, combined with the procedure of debranching. This approach allows diminishing trauma by reducing the duration of the cardiopulmonary bypass. The aim. To describe the rational approach for replacing the total aortic arch depending on the diameter of aneurysm, the condition of the arch vessels, and the acuteness of clinical condition.The main indications for the replacement of the aortic arch are the true atherosclerotic aneurysms, genetic connective tissue diseases (Marfan syndrome), syphilis. The total arch replacement recently becomes more frequent indication for acute type A aortic dissection. The newly introduced strategies of operation and perfusion for total aortic arch replacement are aimed to reduce the risk of neurological complications. This method is named “arch first technique” which gradually replaces the earlier technique, at which the first anastomosis is performed with a descending thoracic aorta. A more traditional method called the “descending aorta first” was selected. A mandatory element of both types of the operation is antegrade cerebral perfusion. The main advantage of this method is maintaining constant perfusion of the brain which significantly reduces the risk of its ischemic damage, avoids deep hypothermia and its negative impact on blood coagulation system. The technique of total arch replacement consists of the following elements: access, double arterial cannulation, the method of brain protection, formation of distal anastomosis with descending thoracic aorta, implantation of arch vessels into the prosthesis. Sequence of anastomosis depends on morphological and clinical peculiarities of the specific case. Changes in the strategy for “open” total aortic arch replacement in various aortic pathologies is discussed based on the author’s clinical experience and literature data. Conclusions. Total aortic arch replacement remains a traumatic and technically demanding operation, the main risks of which are hemorrhage and ischemic brain lesions. The method of arch replacement – “descending aorta first” includes double arterial cannulation, antegrade cerebral perfusion, deep hypothermia with complete blood flow stoppage for the lower half of the body and the use of multi-branch vascular prosthesis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinejie Du ◽  
Zhongrong Fang ◽  
Yanhua Sun ◽  
Congya Zhang ◽  
Guiyu Lei ◽  
...  

Background: The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome (sSIRS) after total aortic arch replacement between patients who underwent moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (MHCA) and those who underwent deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA).Methods: At Fuwai Hospital, 600 patients who underwent total aortic arch replacement with MHCA or DHCA from January 2013 to December 2016 were consecutively enrolled and divided into DHCA (14.1–20.0°C) and MHCA (20.1–28.0°C) groups. Preliminary statistical analysis revealed that some baseline indicators differed between the two groups; therefore, propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the covariates. Post-operative sSIRS as the primary outcome was compared between the groups both before and after PSM.Results: A total of 275 (45.8%) patients underwent MHCA, and 325 (54.2%) patients underwent DHCA. After PSM analysis, a total of 191 matched pairs were obtained. The overall incidence of sSIRS was 27.3%. There was no significant difference in post-operative sSIRS between the MHCA group and the DHCA group in either the overall cohort or the PSM cohort (no-PSM: P = 0.188; PSM: P = 0.416); however, post-operative sSIRS was increased by ~4% in the DHCA group compared with the MHCA group in both the no-PSM and PSM cohorts (no-PSM: 29.5 vs. 24.7%; PSM: 29.3 vs. 25.1%). Both before and after PSM, the rates of gastrointestinal hemorrhage and pulmonary infection and post-operative length of stay were significantly increased in the DHCA group compared with the MHCA group (P < 0.05), and the remaining secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the groups.Conclusions: MHCA and DHCA are associated with comparable incidences of sSIRS in patients following total aortic arch replacement for type A aortic dissection. However, the MHCA group had a shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time, a shorter post-operative length of stay and lower pulmonary infection and gastrointestinal hemorrhage rates than the DHCA group. We cautiously recommend the use of MHCA for most total arch replacements in patients with type A aortic dissection.


Perfusion ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 663-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Li ◽  
Xiaogang Sun ◽  
Xiuhui Zhang ◽  
Yuchun Zhang ◽  
Guanghui Pang ◽  
...  

Deep hypothermia or circulation arrest is widely used during total aortic arch replacement. However, conventional procedures have high morbidity and mortality.1 We use the “branch-first” technique2,3 combined with clamping the distal aorta, incorporating a stented elephant trunk to avoid deep hypothermia and circulation arrest. This technique brings us closer to the goal of arch surgery without cerebral or visceral circulatory arrest and the morbidity of deep hypothermia. Early results are encouraging.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document