Direct true lumen cannulation for type A aortic dissection (Samurai technique) in emergency scenarios

Choosing the optimal arterial cannulation site in type A aortic dissection may be challenging. Aortic dissection is a dynamic condition that can change at any time. Thus all the alternatives available should be known by surgeons in order to adapt to the possible problems that may arise. In this video tutorial, we present a patient with acute type A aortic dissection who, after cardiopulmonary bypass with axillary arterial cannulation, developed a major complication: intraoperative malperfusion due to pressurization of the false lumen. The patient developed occlusion of the right coronary artery with electrocardiogram changes, inferior akinesia, and ventricular arrhythmias. Cerebral saturation was also significantly decreased. This scenario of acute malperfusion calls for immediate action. We proceeded to switch the cardiopulmonary bypass configuration from axillary to direct true lumen cannulation. This technique, also known as the Samurai technique, is feasible in most cases and advantageous in this emergency situation, allowing prompt reestablishment of adequate perfusion of the true lumen . Some authors even advocate more widespread use of this technique because it may ensure antegrade perfusion while avoiding progression of the dissection flap and reduce the rate of the most common complications of other cannulation sites such as plexus injury during axillary cannulation or cerebral embolization through mobilization of thrombi or calcification from femoral retrograde perfusion. This technique is useful in cases of circumferential dissection and in patients with relative contraindications for peripheral cannulation such as morbid obesity or peripheral arterial occlusion by atherosclerosis or by the dissection itself.

Double arterial cannulation versus right axillary artery cannulation for acute type A aortic dissection: a retrospective study

Background Cannulation strategy in surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains controversial. We aimed to retrospectively analyze the safety and efficacy of double arterial cannulation (DAC) compared with right axillary cannulation (RAC) for ATAAD. Methods From January 2016 to December 2018, 431 ATAAD patients were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into DAC group (n = 341) and RAC group (n = 90). Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the early and mid-term outcomes between these two groups. To confirm the organ protection effect by DAC, intraoperative blood gas results and cardiopulmonary bypass parameters were compared between the two groups. Results Demographics and preoperative comorbidities were comparable between two groups, while patients in DAC group were younger than RAC group (51.55 ± 13.21 vs. 56.07 ± 12.16 years, P < 0.001). DAC had a higher incidence of limb malperfusion (18.2% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.063) and lower incidence of coronary malperfusion (5.3% vs. 12.2%, P = 0.019). No significant difference in cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time was found between the two groups. The in-hospital mortality was 13.5% (58/431), while there was no difference between the two groups (13.5% vs. 13.3%; P = 0.969). Patients who underwent DAC had higher incidence of postoperative stroke (5.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.019) and lower incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) (24.7% vs. 40.3%; P = 0.015). During a mean follow-up period of 31.8 (interquartile range, 25–45) months, the overall survival was 81.5% for DAC group and 78.0% for RAC group (P = 0.560). Intraoperative blood gas results and cardiopulmonary bypass parameters showed that DAC group had more intraoperative urine output volume than RAC group (P = 0.05), and the time of cooling (P = 0.04) and rewarming (P = 0.04) were shorter in DAC group. Conclusions DAC will not increase the surgical risks compared to RAC, but could reduce the incidence of postoperative AKI which may be benefit for renal protection.

Clinical experience of use of percutaneous peripheral arterial cannulation in sick neonates in a developing country

Background Continuous invasive arterial monitoring is necessary in sick neonates needing hemodynamic and ventilatory support. The primary objective of our study was to describe clinical experience with percutaneous peripheral arterial cannulation (PAC) in sick neonates. Methods Neonates needing PAC were prospectively enrolled in the study. Inclusion criteria were: neonates needing respiratory support (invasive or non-invasive), neonates requiring vasoactive medications or neonate likely to need more than 5 sampling pricks in 24 h. Results One hundred eight neonates (93.1%) needed cannulation of one arterial site while 8 (6.9%) needed cannulation of 2 arterial sites, thus giving a total of 124 cannulations. Out of the 124 cannulations, 102 (82%) were performed in first attempt, while 22 (18%) cannulations needed 2 or more attempts. Serious complications like discolouration of digits, blanching of skin or bleeding were seen in 6 (4.9%) cannulations. These resolved after removal of arterial line and no long term consequences were noted. On comparing neonates having radial arterial cannulation(n = 108) with posterior tibial arterial cannulation (n = 16) there was no difference in duration of arterial line between radial artery group (mean, SD 53.30 ± 22.56) and posterior tibial artery group (mean, SD 48.25 ± 27.39). However, more attempts were needed to cannulate post tibial artery (mean, SD 2.25 ± 1.32) as compared to radial artery (mean 1.22 ± 0.789) and this difference was statistically significant (MD -1.02, 95% CI − 1.75 to − 0.30). There was no difference in incidence of serious complications between the radial artery group (3.7%, n = 4) as compared to posterior tibial group (5.5%, n = 1, OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.06–5.51, p = 0.63). Conclusions Peripheral arterial cannulation is a safe method for hemodynamic monitoring and blood sampling in sick neonates. Complications can be minimized by diligent monitoring and proactive removal of line if there is damping of tracing.

Double Arterial Cannulation Versus Right Axillary Artery Cannulation for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: a Retrospective Study

Background: Cannulation strategy in surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains controversial. We aimed to retrospectively analyze the safety and efficacy of double arterial cannulation (DAC) compared with right axillary cannulation (RAC) for ATAAD.Methods: From January 2016 to December 2018, 431 ATAAD patients were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into DAC group (n=341) and RAC group (n=90). Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the early and mid-term outcomes between these two groups. To confirm the organ protection effect by DAC, intraoperative blood gas results and cardiopulmonary bypass parameters were compared between the two groups.Results: Demographics and preoperative comorbidities were comparable between two groups, while patients in DAC group were younger than RAC group (51.55±13.21 vs. 56.07±12.16 years, P＜0.001 ) . DAC had a higher incidence of limb malperfusion (18.2% vs. 10.0%, P=0.063) and lower incidence of coronary malperfusion (5.3% vs. 12.2%, P=0.019). No significant difference in cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time was found between the two groups. The in-hospital mortality was 13.5% (58/431), while there was no difference between the two groups (13.5% vs. 13.3%; P=0.969). Patients who underwent DAC had higher incidence of postoperative stroke (5.9% vs. 0%, P=0.019) and lower incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) (24.7% vs. 40.3%; P=0.015). During a mean follow-up period of 31.8 (interquartile range, 25-45) months, the overall survival was 81.5% for DAC group and 78.0% for RAC group (P=0.560). Intraoperative blood gas results and cardiopulmonary bypass parameters showed that DAC group had more intraoperative urine output volume than RAC group (P=0.05), and the time of cooling (P=0.04) and rewarming (P=0.04) were shorter in DAC group.Conclusions: DAC will not increase the surgical risks compared to RAC, but could reduce the incidence of postoperative AKI which may be benefit for renal protection.

Comparative clinical efficacy of novel bidirectional cannula in cardiac surgery via peripheral cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the novel bidirectional cannula that ensures stable distal perfusion compared to conventional cannula in patients undergoing femoral arterial cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Methods: During a 1-year period, 64 patients undergoing surgery via peripheral cannulation were prospectively randomized to receive 19 F bidirectional (Biflow™, LivaNova, Italy) or 19 F conventional (HLS Peripheral cannula, Getinge Group™, Germany) cannula with 6 F downstream line (Bicakcilar™, Turkey) for femoral artery cannulation. The primary outcome included the efficacy (adequacy of antegrade/retrograde comparative flow via cannula measured by doppler ultrasonography) and the secondary outcome was the safety (early/late complications and adverse events). Results: Percent flow (distal/proximal) after cannulation measured by doppler ultrasonography was significantly better in study group (33.1 ± 5 ml/min) versus downstream cannula (16.1 ± 4, p = 0.012). SpO2 measured by near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) also demonstrated significantly better saturation in distal calf of the cannulated leg in bidirectional cannula group (67.5% ± 10% vs 52.5 ± 8, p = 0.04). The incidence of serious adverse events was seroma on femoral region (one patient), superficial wound infection (one patient), pseudo-hematoma (two patients) in bidirectional cannula group and in-hospital femoral embolectomy/artery repair (two patients), superficial wound infection (three patients), cannulation site hematoma (three patients) in conventional cannula group. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that in patients undergoing femoral arterial cannulation for CPB during cardiac surgery, the use of a novel bidirectional cannula is safe and easy to insert and provides stable distal perfusion of the cannulated limb.

Scale ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation in infant: A randomized controlled trial

Background: Cannulation of the radial artery can be extremely challenging in infants. Scale ultrasound can provide accurate arterial location and guidance for operators. We hypothesized that scale ultrasound helps increase the initial success rate of radial artery cannulation in this population. Method: Seventy-six infants aged 0–3 months who needed arterial puncture after general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups (1:1 ratio): the scale ultrasound group and the traditional ultrasound group. The primary endpoints were the success rate of the first attempt and the total success rate of arterial cannulation. The secondary endpoints were the time during arterial puncture and the incidence of vascular complications. Results: The success rate of the first attempt and the total success rate of arterial cannulation were 92.1% (35/38) versus 50% (19/38) and 100% (38/38) versus 86.8% (33/38) in the scale ultrasound and traditional ultrasound group ( p < 0.005), respectively. The median time to ultrasound location, needle entry into the radial artery, and successful cannulation in the scale ultrasound group were significantly shorter than those in the traditional ultrasound group: 10 (8.0, 17.2) s, 15 (11.7, 20) s, and 65 (53.8, 78.5) s vs 30 (26.5, 43.5) s, 35 (23, 51) s, and 224.5 (123.5, 356) s ( p < 0.001), respectively. The incidence of hematoma was higher in the traditional group ( p < 0.005). Conclusions: Scale ultrasound-guided radial arterial cannulation can significantly improved initial success rate and overall success rate, shorten puncture time in infant, compared with that achieved with the use of traditional ultrasound guidance.