scholarly journals Reply: The future of guideline-based prophylactic proximal aortic surgery is “patient-specific” but not diameter-based metrics

Author(s):  
G. Chad Hughes
Author(s):  
Lakshya P. Rathore ◽  
Naina Verma

Additive manufacturing (AM) is a novel technique that despite having been around for more than 35 years, has been underutilized. Its great advantage lies in the basic fact that it is incredibly customizable. Since its use was recognized in various fields of medicine like orthopaedics, otorhinolaryngology, ophthalmology etc, it has proved to be one of the most promising developments in most of them. Customizable orthotics, prosthetics and patient specific implants and tracheal splints are few of its advantages. And in the future too, the combination of tissue engineering with AM is believed to produce an immense change in biological tissue replacement.


2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Giambini ◽  
Bradford L. Currier ◽  
Michael J. Yaszemski ◽  
Ahmad Nassr

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajesh N. Maniar ◽  
Tushar Singhi

Micromachines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Lourdes Garcia ◽  
Genevieve Kerns ◽  
Kaitlin O’Reilley ◽  
Omolola Okesanjo ◽  
Jacob Lozano ◽  
...  

Developments in medical device design result in advances in wearable technologies, minimally invasive surgical techniques, and patient-specific approaches to medicine. In this review, we analyze the trajectory of biomedical and engineering approaches to soft robotics for healthcare applications. We review current literature across spatial scales and biocompatibility, focusing on engineering done at the biotic-abiotic interface. From traditional techniques for robot design to advances in tunable material chemistry, we look broadly at the field for opportunities to advance healthcare solutions in the future. We present an extracellular matrix-based robotic actuator and propose how biomaterials and proteins may influence the future of medical device design.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Lepowsky ◽  
Savas Tasoglu

Since a three-dimensional (3D) printed drug was first approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2015, there has been a growing interest in 3D printing for drug manufacturing. There are multiple 3D printing methods – including selective laser sintering, binder deposition, stereolithography, inkjet printing, extrusion-based printing, and fused deposition modeling – which are compatible with printing drug products, in addition to both polymer filaments and hydrogels as materials for drug carriers. We see the adaptability of 3D printing as a revolutionary force in the pharmaceutical industry. Release characteristics of drugs may be controlled by complex 3D printed geometries and architectures. Precise and unique doses can be engineered and fabricated via 3D printing according to individual prescriptions. On-demand printing of drug products can be implemented for drugs with limited shelf life or for patient-specific medications, offering an alternative to traditional compounding pharmacies. For these reasons, 3D printing for drug manufacturing is the future of pharmaceuticals, making personalized medicine possible while also transforming pharmacies.


2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurcan üçeyler ◽  
Claudia Sommer ◽  
◽  

Neuropathic pain is a common and disabling condition that may accompany disorders of the somatosensory system at different anatomical levels. Making the diagnosis of neuropathic pain is a prerequisite for offering the patient specific therapy. In the last few years, the methodological toolbox for the assessment of neuropathic pain has been improved and replenished so that different instruments are available to examine patients and to find out if and to what extent neuropathic pain is present. Currently, three published guidelines are available on the assessment of neuropathic pain. These guidelines are summarised and detailed below, and suggestions are made for future studies investigating known and new methods for the improvement of neuropathic pain assessment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dharanipathy Rangaraj ◽  
Sridhar Yaddanapudi ◽  
Jing Cai

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document