Adding Renal Scan Data Improves the Accuracy of a Computational Model to Predict Vesicoureteral Reflux Resolution

2008 ◽  
Vol 180 (4S) ◽  
pp. 1648-1652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth G. Nepple ◽  
Matthew J. Knudson ◽  
J. Christopher Austin ◽  
Moshe Wald ◽  
Antoine A. Makhlouf ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (05) ◽  
pp. 470-474
Author(s):  
Bilge Karabulut ◽  
Gulsah Bayram ◽  
Can Ihsan Oztorun ◽  
Burak Ozcift ◽  
Tuğrul Hüseyin Tiryaki

Introduction Detecting renal scar is important in pediatric patients with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) for deciding on treatment option. The aim of this study is to detect whether freehand elastosonography technique could be an alternative to dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scan in determining renal scar formation. Materials and Methods Between November 2015 and April 2016, 25 VUR patients, age ranging from 3 to 17 years admitted to our clinic, had urinary ultrasound and elastosonography, and data of approximately 147 renal region were recorded. Data were upper, middle, and lower pole renal parenchymal thickness and echogenicities obtained by ultrasound and these poles strain target (ST), strain reference (SR), and strain index (SI) values obtained by freehand elastosonography. DMSA scan data (differential function and upper, middle, and lower pole parenchymal scar formation) were recorded. Results Scar formation and more than 10% reduction in differential function in renal scan were statistically higher in renal regions in which parenchymal thinning and echogenicity increase was detected by ultrasound. There was no elastosonographic data difference between renal units with and without differential function decrease. Also, there was no elastosonographic data difference between renal units with and without scar formation. Conclusion In this study, we could not find any significant difference in term of tissue tension values (ST and SI) measured by freehand elastosonography between renal units with and without scar formation in renal scan.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Chertin ◽  
Ksenia Prosolovich ◽  
Sagiv Aharon ◽  
Ofer Nativ ◽  
Sarel Halachmi

Purpose. In recent years, endoscopic injection became the procedure of choice for the correction of vesicoureteral reflux in the majority of the centers. Unfortunately, endoscopic treatment is not always successful and sometimes requires more than one trial to achieve similar results to that of an open reimplantation surgery. Our aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and success rate of open ureteral reimplantation following failed endoscopic procedure.Patients and Methods. During 2004–2010, we evaluated 16 patients with persistent vesicoureteral reflux (grades II–IV) following failed endoscopic treatment. All patients underwent open ureteral reimplantation. All patients were followed with an ultrasound 6 weeks following surgery and every 6 months thereafter for an average of 22 months. Voiding cystography was performed at 3 months after surgery.Results. During unilateral open ureteral reimplantation, the implanted deposit from previous procedures was either excised, drained, or incorporated into the neotunnel with the ureter. Vesicoureteral reflux was resolved in all patients with 100% success rate. No new hydronephrosis or signs of obstruction developed in any of the patients. qDMSA renal scan was available in 8 patients showing improvement of function in 5 and stable function in 3, and no new scars were identified.Conclusions. Open ureteral reimplantation is an excellent choice for the correction of failed endoscopic treatment in children with vesicoureteral reflux.


2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 740-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Bertolo ◽  
Cristian Fiori ◽  
Federico Piramide ◽  
Daniele Amparore ◽  
Francesco Porpiglia

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document