MP61-08 PROGRESSION OF T1 HIGH RISK INTO MUSCLE-INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER IS AN INDEPENDENT PROGNOSTIC FACTOR OF MORTALITY AFTER RADICAL CYSTECTOMY

2014 ◽  
Vol 191 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Pellucchi ◽  
Marco Moschini ◽  
Lorenzo Rocchini ◽  
Giovanni La Croce ◽  
Vito Cucchiara ◽  
...  
Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Kubon ◽  
Danijel Sikic ◽  
Markus Eckstein ◽  
Veronika Weyerer ◽  
Robert Stöhr ◽  
...  

Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), which is characterized by a recurrence rate of approximately 30% and very long treatment times, remains a major unresolved problem for patients and the health care system. The immunological interplay between tumor cells and the immune environment is important for tumor development. Therefore, we analyzed the mRNA of three immune markers, CXCL9, PD1 and PD-L1, in NMIBC by qRT-PCR. The results were subsequently correlated with clinicopathological parameters and prognostic data. Altogether, as expected, higher age was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS), but not for recurrence-free survival (RFS). Lower CXCL9 mRNA was observed in multivariate Cox’s regression analysis to be an independent prognostic parameter for reduced OS (relative risk; RR = 2.08; p = 0.049), DSS (RR = 4.49; p = 0.006) and RFS (RR = 2.69; p = 0.005). In addition, PD-L1 mRNA was an independent prognostic factor for DSS (RR = 5.02; p = 0.042) and RFS (RR = 2.07; p = 0.044). Moreover, in univariate Cox’s regression analysis, the stratification of patients revealed that low CXCL9 or low PD1 mRNA was associated with reduced RFS in the younger patient group (≤71 years), but not in the older patient group (>71 years). In addition, low CXCL9 or low PD-L1 was associated with shorter RFS in patients with higher tumor cell proliferation and in patients without instillation therapy. In conclusion, the characterization of mRNA levels of immune markers differentiates NIMBC patients with respect to prognosis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 199 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Abdus Salam ◽  
Mir Ehteshamul Haque ◽  
Faisal Islam ◽  
Kaiser Ibrahim ◽  
Shahinul Islam ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. e017913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie B Oughton ◽  
Heather Poad ◽  
Maureen Twiddy ◽  
Michelle Collinson ◽  
Victoria Hiley ◽  
...  

IntroductionHigh-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HRNMIBC) is a heterogeneous disease that can be difficult to predict. While around 25% of cancers progress to invasion and metastases, the remaining majority of tumours remain within the bladder. It is uncertain whether patients with HRNMIBC are better treated with intravesical maintenance BCG (mBCG) immunotherapy or primary radical cystectomy (RC). A definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed to compare these two different treatments but may be difficult to recruit to and has not been attempted to date. Before undertaking such an RCT, it is important to understand whether such a comparison is possible and how best to achieve it.Methods and analysisBRAVO is a multi-centre, parallel-group, mixed-methods, individually randomised, controlled, feasibility study for patients with HRNMIBC. Participants will be randomised to receive either mBCG immunotherapy or RC. The primary objective is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of performing the definitive phase III trial via estimation of eligibility and recruitment rates, assessing uptake of allocated treatment and compliance with mBCG, determining quality-of-life questionnaire completion rates and exploring reasons expressed by patients for declining recruitment into the study. We aim to recruit 60 participants from six centres in the UK. Surgical trials with disparate treatment options find recruitment challenging from both the patient and clinician perspective. By building on the experiences of other similar trials through implementing a comprehensive training package aimed at clinicians to address these challenges (qualitative substudy), we hope that we can demonstrate that a phase III trial is feasible.Ethics and disseminationThe study has ethical approval (16/YH/0268). Findings will be made available to patients, clinicians, the funders and the National Health Service through traditional publishing and social media.Trial registration numberISRCTN12509361; Pre results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document