MP6-05 THE ASSOCIATION OF PREOPERATIVE NEUTROPHIL TO LYMPHOCYTE RATIO WITH ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE CANCER

2015 ◽  
Vol 193 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vidit Sharma ◽  
Patrick A. Cockerill ◽  
Boyd R. Viers ◽  
Laureano J. Rangel ◽  
Rachel E. Carlson ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoko Maeda ◽  
Takashi Kawahara ◽  
Mitsuyuki Koizumi ◽  
Hiroki Ito ◽  
Yohei Kumano ◽  
...  

Introduction. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), which can be easily calculated from routine complete blood counts of the peripheral blood, has been suggested to serve as a prognostic factor for some solid malignancies. In the present study, we aimed to determine the relationship between NLR in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) and their prognosis.Materials and Methods. We assessed NLR in 73 men (patients) who received RP for their prostate cancer. We also performed immunohistochemistry for CD8 and CD66b in a separate set of RP specimens.Results. The median NLR in the 73 patients was 1.85. There were no significant correlations of NLR with tumor grade (p=0.834), pathological T stage (p=0.082), lymph node metastasis (p=0.062), or resection margin status (p=0.772). Based on the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) to predict biochemical recurrence after RP, potential NLR cut-off point was determined to be 2.88 or 3.88. However, both of these cut-off points did not precisely predict the prognosis. There were no statistically significant differences in the number of CD66b-positive neutrophils or CD8-positive lymphocytes between stromal tissues adjacent to cancer glands and stromal tissues away from cancer glands and between different grades or stages of tumors.Conclusions. There was no association between NLR and biochemical failure after prostatectomy.


Oncotarget ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 11778-11787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Won Sik Jang ◽  
Kang Su Cho ◽  
Myung Soo Kim ◽  
Cheol Yong Yoon ◽  
Dong Hyuk Kang ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. e441
Author(s):  
W.S. Jang ◽  
Y.J. Kang ◽  
J.H. Han ◽  
J.Y. Lee ◽  
K.S. Cho ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 355
Author(s):  
Matteo Ferro ◽  
Gennaro Musi ◽  
Deliu Victor Matei ◽  
Alessandro Francesco Mistretta ◽  
Stefano Luzzago ◽  
...  

Background: circulating levels of lymphocytes, platelets and neutrophils have been identified as factors related to unfavorable clinical outcome for many solid tumors. The aim of this cohort study is to evaluate and validate the use of the Prostatic Systemic Inflammatory Markers (PSIM) score in predicting and improving the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in men undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy for low-risk prostate cancer who met the inclusion criteria for active surveillance. Methods: we reviewed the medical records of 260 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria for active surveillance. We performed a head-to-head comparison between the histological findings of specimens after radical prostatectomy (RP) and prostate biopsies. The PSIM score was calculated on the basis of positivity according to cutoffs (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) 2.0, platelets-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) 118 and monocyte-to-lymphocyte-ratio (MLR) 5.0), with 1 point assigned for each value exceeding the specified threshold and then summed, yielding a final score ranging from 0 to 3. Results: median NLR was 2.07, median PLR was 114.83, median MLR was 3.69. Conclusion: we found a significantly increase in the rate of pathological International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) ≥ 2 with the increase of PSIM. At the multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, prostate volume and PSIM, the latter was found the sole independent prognostic variable influencing probability of adverse pathology.


2016 ◽  
Vol 195 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dae Keun Kim ◽  
Atalla Alatawi ◽  
Abulhasan Sheikh ◽  
Ibrahim Alabdulaali ◽  
Ali Abdel Raheem ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document