Re: Predictors of Spermatogenesis in Radical Orchiectomy Specimen and Potential Implications for Patients with Testicular Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 197 (4) ◽  
pp. 1136-1136
Author(s):  
Craig Niederberger
2015 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
Yutaka Fujisue ◽  
Junko Kono ◽  
Yatsugu Kotake ◽  
Hiroshi Masuda ◽  
Yoshiki Yamashita ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 181 (4S) ◽  
pp. 199-199
Author(s):  
Abdulaziz Baazeem ◽  
Jason M Boman ◽  
Philippe Violette ◽  
Armand Zini

Author(s):  
Rishi Narine ◽  
Heba Osman ◽  
Sirote Wongwaisayawan ◽  
Scott Morgan ◽  
Luke T. Lavallee ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Glicksman ◽  
Robert J. Hamilton ◽  
Peter Chung

Treatment of testicular cancer is dependent on the stage of disease at presentation. Stage 1 testicular cancer is treated with radical orchiectomy, followed by active surveillance, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy. Occasionally, unusual and unexpected postoperative changes can be seen on computed tomography (CT), and may raise concern for metastatic disease.Here, we present two cases of testicular cancer patients who developed retroperitoneal hematomas post-radical orchiectomy, one as a classical clinical presentation, and the other as an atypicalradiological entity only. The first is a case of a 38-year-old male with a non-seminoma testicular cancer, who developed severe flank pain, hemodynamic instability, and progressive anemia from a retroperitoneal hematoma in the immediate (<24 hours) postoperative period, requiring urgent surgical evacuation. The second is a case of a 33-year-old male with a testicular seminoma who had a large, suspicious retroperitoneal mass on a staging CT scan concerning for metastatic disease, which was later diagnosed asa retroperitoneal hematoma. These cases reveal the clinical variability with which a retroperitoneal hematoma post-radical orchiectomy may present. In addition, the second case demonstrates the importance of recognizing radiological postoperative changes and ensuring that these findings are not mistaken for and treated as metastatic disease.


2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ohad Shoshany ◽  
Yariv Shtabholtz ◽  
Eran Schreter ◽  
Maxim Yakimov ◽  
Haim Pinkas ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 039156032092171
Author(s):  
G Pizzuto ◽  
M Barale ◽  
O Sedigh ◽  
B Frea

Literature: The cancer of testicles represents 1% of male neoplasms and 5% of urological malignant neoplasm. Its incidence has been growing in Western societies. Cancer of testicles usually presents as an increase of consistence in one testicles and absence of pain, as a casual ultrasound scan finding, or it could be highlighted by a scrotal injury. The surgical treatment is either radical orchiectomy or radical orchiectomy plus retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Case presentation: The case presented concerns a 48-year-old male with a history of left testicular trauma and subsequent hypotrophy. Over the next 4 years, the patient developed a testicle size increase up to 15 cm in diameter. At diagnosis, he had retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. The patient was, after surgery, referred to the oncology department. Conclusion: The awareness of the male population respect to testicular cancer and its screening methods (e.g. self-examination) is essential to make the diagnosis at an early stage. It is also essential to psychologically support patients undergoing surgical and/or pharmacological therapy due to risk of determining anxiety or depression compared to the whole population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document