scholarly journals Effect of Anti-Diabetic Drugs On Risk of Fracture In Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Network Meta-Analytic Synthesis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Thiazolidinediones

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. A526
Author(s):  
M Adil ◽  
P Ghosh ◽  
SK Venkata ◽  
K Raygude ◽  
D Gaba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Risk Of Fracture ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2016 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 382-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Devi ◽  
Ghanshyam Mali ◽  
Indrani Chakraborty ◽  
Mazhuvancherry Kesavan Unnikrishnan ◽  
Suhaj Abdulsalim
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled

A Review: Comparison of Efficacy of Liraglutide Versus Sitagliptin add-on-to Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 2291-2295
Author(s):  
A. Kavyasree ◽  
P. Geetha ◽  
P. Shanmugasundaram
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Gastrointestinal Problems

Background: The aim of this review is to compare the efficacy of liraglutide versus sitagliptin add-on-to metformin in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and inadequate glycemic control for rational use of drugs. Methods: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) in MEDLINE, Web of science, PubMed, Cochrane library, CNKI, and Wanfang database and extracted data from all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to July 11, 2019 of liraglutide versus sitagliptin given in combination with metformin. RCTs were selected only if they were RCTs comparing DPP-4 inhibitor (sitagliptin) monotherapy to metformin monotherapy with the GLP-1 Receptor Agonists (liraglutide), duration of treatment was ≥26 weeks and reported data on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) change, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) change, Odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD), 95% confidence interval are used to analyze the outcomes. Results: A total of 2,257 patients from 6 RCTs were included in the study. When compared with sitagliptin (100mg) in combination with metformin group, the group of patients treated with liraglutide1.2mg and 1.8mg and metformin, produced greater reduction in HbA1c, FBG. (95% CI). The group of patients with 1.8mg liraglutide had significant weight loss. The incidence of nausea, hypoglycemic episodes, gastrointestinal problems was higher than the sitagliptin with metformin groups. Conclusions: The results of this study indicated that the liraglutide – metformin combination therapy could significantly lower the HbA1c level and increased reduction of body weight. ADRs such as gastrointestinal problems, hypoglycemic episodes were common in liraglutide treatment group.

scholarly journals Effects of Probiotic Supplementation on Dyslipidemia in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Foods ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 1540
Author(s):  
Chen Wang ◽  
Chengcheng Zhang ◽  
Sijia Li ◽  
Leilei Yu ◽  
Fengwei Tian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Probiotic Supplementation ◽  
Randomized Controlled

The effectiveness of probiotic consumption in controlling dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been unclear. We reviewed relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to clarify the effect of probiotic intake on dyslipidemia in T2DM patients. The Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were used for searching relevant RCTs published up to October 2020. The total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations were selected as the primary indicators for dyslipidemia. The results of 13 eligible RCTs showed that probiotic intake could significantly reduce TC (SMD: −0.23, 95% CI: (−0.37, −0.10)) and TG (SMD: −0.27, 95% CI: (−0.44, −0.11)) levels, but did not regulate LDL-C or HDL-C concentrations. Subgroup analysis showed that multispecies probiotics (≥two species), but not single-species probiotics, significantly decreased TC and TG concentrations. Furthermore, powder, but not liquid, probiotics could reduce TC and TG concentrations. This meta-analysis demonstrated that probiotic supplementation is helpful in reducing TC and TG concentrations in T2DM patients. However, more well-controlled trials are needed to clarify the benefits of probiotics on dyslipidemia in T2DM patients.

scholarly journals Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and fracture risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 204062232096159
Author(s):  
Yake Lou ◽  
Ying Yu ◽  
Junchao Duan ◽  
Sining Bi ◽  
Khaing Nyein Chan Swe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Risk Of Fracture ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Increased Risk

Background: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have an increased risk of fracture compared with those without T2DM. Some oral glucose-lowering agents may increase the incidence of fracture. Whether sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are associated with increased risk of fracture remains unclear. Methods: We retrieved articles from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library database, and other sources up to 24 October 2019. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported fractures and analyzed the fracture incidence of SGLT2i, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and empagliflozin. Subgroup analysis was also performed based on baseline characteristics. Results: A total of 78 RCTs with 85,122 patients were included in our analysis. The overall SGLT2i fracture incidence was 2.56% versus 2.77% in the control group [odds ratio (OR), 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.95, 1.12); p = 0.49]. Compared with the control treatment, treatment with canagliflozin led to a higher rate of fractures [OR, 1.17; 95% CI (1.00, 1.37); p = 0.05], but no significant difference was observed when compared with dapagliflozin [OR, 1.02; 95% CI (0.90, 1.15); p = 0.79] or empagliflozin [OR, 0.89; 95% CI (0.73, 1.10); p = 0.30]. Subgroup analysis showed that, in a follow-up of less than 52 weeks, SGLT2i decreased the incidence of fracture by 29% [OR, 0.71; 95% CI (0.55, 0.93); p = 0.01], but this benefit was lost when the follow-up extended to more than 52 weeks [OR, 1.08; 95% CI (0.98, 1.18); p = 0.12]. Conclusion: Canagliflozin seems to increase the risk of fracture, while other SGLT2is do not result in a higher incidence of fracture.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document