scholarly journals Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Malaria Control Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesong Conteh ◽  
Kathryn Shuford ◽  
Efundem Agboraw ◽  
Mara Kont ◽  
Jan Kolaczinski ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S595
Author(s):  
X. Lu ◽  
M. Radford ◽  
M. Gharaibeh ◽  
P. Gabb ◽  
A. Hewins ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Ward ◽  
Ruben E. Mujica-Mota ◽  
Anne E. Spencer ◽  
Antonieta Medina-Lara

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S43-S51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A Ortiz ◽  
Mayur R Shukla ◽  
Michael J Loeffelholz

Abstract We reviewed relevant syphilis diagnostic literature to address the question “What diagnostic considerations should be taken into account when screening for syphilis using the traditional or reverse algorithm?” Improved laboratory diagnosis of syphilis is an important element of the effort to reduce syphilis rates. Screening for syphilis is performed using either a nontreponemal or treponemal test (part of the traditional or reverse algorithm, respectively). Both syphilis algorithms are used by laboratories. However, there are limited data on the performance and cost-effectiveness of the algorithms. An expert panel generated “key questions” in the laboratory diagnosis of syphilis. This paper pertains to the key factors that should be considered when deciding whether to screen for syphilis using either the traditional or the reverse algorithm. A systematic literature review was performed, and tables of evidence were created to address this question.


2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lazaros Andronis ◽  
Ilias Goranitis ◽  
Sue Bayliss ◽  
Rui Duarte

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carme Pinyol ◽  
Jose Mª Cepeda ◽  
Inmaculada Roldan ◽  
Vanesa Roldan ◽  
Silvia Jimenez ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gian Luca Di Tanna ◽  
Anna Bychenkova ◽  
Frank O’Neill ◽  
Heidi S. Wirtz ◽  
Paul Miller ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document