scholarly journals Significant pulmonary arterial pressure reduction with multi-day versus single-day catheter directed thrombolysis of submassive pulmonary embolism

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. S245-S246
Author(s):  
D Patel ◽  
R Lokken ◽  
J Bui ◽  
A Lipnik ◽  
C Ray ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 127 (4) ◽  
pp. 303-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remedios Otero ◽  
Mikel Oribe ◽  
Aitor Ballaz ◽  
David Jimenez ◽  
Fernando Uresandi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 02 (01) ◽  
pp. 017-022
Author(s):  
Elie Portnoy ◽  
Vibhor Wadhwa ◽  
Mariana Barbosa ◽  
Clifford Weiss ◽  
Brian Holly ◽  
...  

AbstractThe authors seek to evaluate hemodynamic parameters as potential clinical markers of real-time clinical improvement among patients with massive pulmonary embolism (PE) in correlation with post-thrombolytic pulmonary arterial pressure improvement and overall clinical outcome. Thirteen patients with submassive or massive PE were admitted to the interventional radiology service and treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis. Among the four patients who qualified as massive PE, systolic blood pressure (BP) and vasopressor dependence suggested meaningful trends toward clinical improvement, after only 26.4% of treatment course/dose. Hemodynamic parameters such as systolic BP and inotropic vasopressor dependence may be considered in future treatment protocols as early indicators of treatment response.


2013 ◽  
Vol 131 (5) ◽  
pp. e191-e195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remedios Otero ◽  
Teresa Elías ◽  
Luis Jara ◽  
Javier Trujillo-Santos ◽  
Laurent Bertoletti ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 204887262092525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mads Dam Lyhne ◽  
Jacob Gammelgaard Schultz ◽  
Anders Kramer ◽  
Christian Schmidt Mortensen ◽  
Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk ◽  
...  

Background The haemodynamic response following acute, intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism is not well described. We aimed to describe the cardiovascular changes in the initial, critical phase 0–12 hours after acute pulmonary embolism in an in-vivo porcine model. Methods Pigs were randomly allocated to pulmonary embolism ( n = 6) or sham ( n = 6). Pulmonary embolism was administered as autologous blood clots (20 × 1 cm) until doubling of mean pulmonary arterial pressure or mean pulmonary arterial pressure was greater than 34 mmHg. Sham animals received saline. Cardiopulmonary changes were evaluated for 12 hours after intervention by biventricular pressure–volume loop recordings, invasive pressure measurements, arterial and central venous blood gas analyses. Results Mean pulmonary arterial pressure increased ( P < 0.0001) and stayed elevated for 12 hours in the pulmonary embolism group compared to sham. Pulmonary vascular resistance and right ventricular arterial elastance (right ventricular afterload) were increased in the first 11 and 6 hours, respectively, after pulmonary embolism ( P < 0.01 for both) compared to sham. Right ventricular ejection fraction was reduced ( P < 0.01) for 8 hours, whereas a near-significant reduction in right ventricular stroke volume was observed ( P = 0.06) for 4 hours in the pulmonary embolism group compared to sham. Right ventricular ventriculo–arterial coupling was reduced ( P < 0.05) for 6 hours following acute pulmonary embolism despite increased right ventricular mechanical work in the pulmonary embolism group ( P < 0.01) suggesting right ventricular failure. Conclusions In a porcine model of intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism, the increased right ventricular afterload caused initial right ventricular ventriculo–arterial uncoupling and dysfunction. After approximately 6 hours, the right ventricular afterload returned to pre-pulmonary embolism values and right ventricular function improved despite a sustained high pulmonary arterial pressure. These results suggest an initial critical and vulnerable phase of acute pulmonary embolism before haemodynamic adaptation.


Angiology ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Shimizu ◽  
Junko Tanaka ◽  
Norikazu Yamada ◽  
Takahiro Ohnishi ◽  
Mashio Nakamura ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. e308-e315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Schultz ◽  
Asger Andersen ◽  
Mads D. Lyhne ◽  
Daniel D. R. Arcanjo ◽  
Benedict Kjaergaard ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document