scholarly journals 3:36 PM Abstract No. 175 Comparison of safety and efficacy of microwave ablation vs. radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. S77
Author(s):  
E. Wehrenberg-Klee ◽  
R. Arellano ◽  
R. Uppot ◽  
O. Zurkiya ◽  
P. Mueller ◽  
...  
HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Serra ◽  
Valentina Cossiga ◽  
Matteo Serenari ◽  
Cristina Felicani ◽  
Elena Mazzotta ◽  
...  

Haemophilia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takafumi Yamamoto ◽  
Norihiro Imai ◽  
Kenta Yamamoto ◽  
Takanori Ito ◽  
Yoji Ishizu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qianhui Jin ◽  
Xinhua Chen ◽  
Shusen Zheng

Recently, the interventional therapies are used more often in clinical practice for hepatocellular carcinoma. The most commonly used methodologies include radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, laser ablation, and cryotherapy. Most of the interventional operations need local anesthesia combined with intravenous sedation. Also, some interventional therapy centers apply general anesthesia. However, different anesthesia methods can cause diverse effects on patients’ pain management, recovery time, and hospitalization time. For the better understanding of the current anesthesia application status, we summarize and analyze multiple anesthesia methods while being applied in interventional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma; in addition, their characters are also compared in this paper.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document