Corrigendum to “Cost-benefit analysis of the Dutch nature policy: Transaction costs and land market impacts” [Land Use Policy 29 (2012) 827–836]

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roel Jongeneel ◽  
Nico Polman ◽  
Louis Slangen
2021 ◽  
pp. 107-114
Author(s):  
Armando Sánchez Vargas ◽  
D. Martínez Ventura ◽  
C. Gay García ◽  
A. L. Herrera Merino ◽  
Bernardo Olvera

2021 ◽  
pp. 25-48
Author(s):  
Andrew Rudalevige

This chapter builds on the brief discussion from the previous chapter to explore the strands of public administration scholarship stressing the organizational complexity of the executive branch and the difficulty of imposing centralized leadership upon it. It considers the transaction costs involved in managing the executive branch — and seeks to situate presidents as they both respond to the administrative products of the agencies and create their own within the Executive Office of the President (EOP). The notion of contingent centralization, used in other research on policy formulation, is adapted here to the president's decision to “make or buy” a given executive order. What characteristics of an order, or an agency, shape presidential decisions about where to formulate an executive order? When will EOP intervention be most required; when will agencies be given freer rein? The vantage is largely presidential here in asking how presidents can lower their managerial transaction costs. But that frame allows for agencies to have influence over the provision of information and thus scope to shape presidents' cost-benefit analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document