Evaluation of masonry walls subjected to blast loading based on material modelling approach

Author(s):  
Sardasht S. Weli ◽  
Imad Shakir Abbood ◽  
Layth S. Al-Rukaibawi ◽  
Fkrat L. Hamid
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Furtado ◽  
Hugo Rodrigues ◽  
António Arêde ◽  
Humberto Varum

Background: The infill masonry walls are widely used in the construction of reinforced concrete buildings for different reasons (partition, thermal and acoustic demands). Since the ‘60s decade, one of the most common typology in the southern Europe was the double-leaf infill walls. Recent earthquake events proved that this specific typology have an important role in the seismic response of reinforced concrete structures in terms of stiffness, strength and failure mechanisms. However, modelling approaches of these specific infill panels cannot be found over the literature. Objective: Due to this, the major goal of the present manuscript is to present a simplified modelling strategy to simulate the double-leaf infill masonry walls seismic behaviour in the software OpenSees. Method: For this, two different modelling strategies were proposed, namely through a global and an individual modelling of the panels. An equivalent double-strut model was assumed and both strategies were compared and calibrated with experimental results from a full-scale in-plane test of a double-leaf infill masonry wall. Results: The numerical results obtained by each strategy are very accurate in terms of prediction of the specimen’ initial stiffness, maximum strength and strength degradation. Conclusion: From the force evolution throughout the tests, it was observed differences lower than 10%. Globally, the individual modelling approach reached better results.


2019 ◽  
Vol 201 ◽  
pp. 109805 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Chiquito ◽  
L.M. López ◽  
R. Castedo ◽  
A. Pérez-Caldentey ◽  
A.P. Santos

2011 ◽  
Vol 368-373 ◽  
pp. 1435-1439
Author(s):  
Xue Ying Wei ◽  
Tuo Huang ◽  
Nan Li

Pressure-impulse diagrams have been extensively used for damage assessments of structural components subject to a specified blast loading. In this paper, a numerical method is used to generate pressure-impulse diagrams for unreinforced masonry walls subjected to blast loading. A previously developed plastic damage material model accounting for strain rate effects is used for brick and mortar. Three levels of damage criteria are defined based on maximum deflection of the wall and rotation of the supports. The obtained blast response for unreinforced masonry walls are validated against field test data. It is shown that the obtained pressure-impulse diagrams have an improved ability to evaluate the damage level of masonry walls.


2020 ◽  
pp. 204141962092312
Author(s):  
Paolo Del Linz ◽  
Tat Ching Fung ◽  
Chi King Lee ◽  
Werner Riedel

The effect of cased explosives on reinforced concrete components is important for the design of protective structures, since the interaction between the fragments and blast waves can modify or even amplify the damage caused. This work deals with the development of finite element analysis techniques to simulate the combined loading and to understand this interaction. In this work, an experiment conducted with a cased explosive and further tests from the literature were used together to develop and stepwise validate finite element analysis models of the different loading phases. The casing fragment velocities and spatial distribution were derived from explosive expansion simulations of the hull using the smooth particle hydrodynamics method together with a momentum conserving penalty contact. The blast loading applied on the concrete plate was based on established empirical formulae, acting at the same times as the fragments. Comparing the final damage with the experimental records revealed good agreement for most damage patterns. The model was used to identify the different damage evolution stages, such as shock-induced shear plug formation and subsequent structural dynamic bending with the associated damage. In addition, differential model variants with fragment and blast loading in isolation were simulated to resolve the response and damage of each loading component. The blast load caused predominantly bending deformations and damage, while the fragments caused similar cratering as seen in the combined case. However, the final combined damage was larger than that caused by each phenomenon. In the given situation, the fragments created most damage, but the established modelling approach opens the perspective to study these effects also for other ratios of explosive to casing weight and scaled distances, where the contributions might differ. Establishing a valid modelling approach is thus an important step towards more insight into the interaction of these complex loading types and damage effects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document