scholarly journals The effects of host-feeding on stability of discrete-time host–parasitoid population dynamic models

2016 ◽  
Vol 272 ◽  
pp. 54-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooks Emerick ◽  
Abhyudai Singh
2016 ◽  
Vol 77 (10) ◽  
pp. 1792-1804 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. N. Barabanov ◽  
D. A. Novikov

Author(s):  
Ronald K. Pearson

It was emphasized in Chapter 1 that low-order, linear time-invariant models provide the foundation for much intuition about dynamic phenomena in the real world. This chapter provides a brief review of the characteristics and behavior of linear models, beginning with these simple cases and then progressing to more complex examples where this intuition no longer holds: infinite-dimensional and time-varying linear models. In continuous time, infinite-dimensional linear models arise naturally from linear partial differential equations whereas in discrete time, infinite-dimensional linear models may be used to represent a variety of “slow decay” effects. Time-varying linear models are also extremely flexible: In the continuous-time case, many of the ordinary differential equations defining special functions (e.g., the equations defining Bessel functions) may be viewed as time-varying linear models; in the discrete case, the gamma function arises naturally as the solution of a time-varying difference equation. Sec. 2.1 gives a brief discussion of low-order, time-invariant linear dynamic models, using second-order examples to illustrate both the “typical” and “less typical” behavior that is possible for these models. One of the most powerful results of linear system theory is that any time-invariant linear dynamic system may be represented as either a moving average (i.e., convolution-type) model or an autoregressive one. Sec. 2.2 presents a short review of these ideas, which will serve to establish both notation and a certain amount of useful intuition for the discussion of NARMAX models presented in Chapter 4. Sec. 2.3 then briefly considers the problem of characterizing linear models, introducing four standard input sequences that are typical of those used in linear model characterization. These standard sequences are then used in subsequent chapters to illustrate differences between nonlinear model behavior and linear model behavior. Sec. 2.4 provides a brief introduction to infinite-dimensional linear systems, including both continuous-time and discrete-time examples. Sec. 2.5 provides a similar introduction to the subject of time-varying linear systems, emphasizing the flexibility of this class. Finally, Sec. 2.6 briefly considers the nature of linearity, presenting some results that may be used to define useful classes of nonlinear models.


2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krist Vaesen

AbstractIn my response to the commentaries from a collection of esteemed researchers, I reassess and eventually find largely intact my claim that human tool use evidences higher social and non-social cognitive ability. Nonetheless, I concede that my examination of individual-level cognitive traits does not offer a full explanation of cumulative culture yet. For that, one needs to incorporate them into population-dynamic models of cultural evolution. I briefly describe my current and future work on this.


Author(s):  
Ronald K. Pearson

The primary objective of this book has been to present a reasonably broad overview of the different classes of discrete-time dynamic models that have been proposed for empirical modeling, particularly in the process control literature. In its simplest form, the empirical modeling process consists of the following four steps: 1. Select a class C of model structures 2. Generate input/output data from the physical process P 3. Determine the model M ∊ C that best fits this dataset 4. Assess the general validity of the model M. The objective of this final chapter is to briefly examine these four modeling steps, with particular emphasis on the first since the choice of the model class C ultimately determines the utility of the empirical model, both with respect to the application (e.g., the difficulty of solving the resulting model-based control problem) and with respect to fidelity of approximation. Some of the basic issues of model structure selection are introduced in Sec. 8.1 and a more detailed treatment is given in Sec. 8.3, emphasizing connections with results presented in earlier chapters; in addition, the problem of model structure selection is an important component of the case studies presented in Secs. 8.2 and 8.5. The second step in this procedure—input sequence design—is discussed in some detail in Sec. 8.4 and is an important component of the second case study (Sec. 8.5). The literature associated with the parameter estimation problem—the third step in the empirical modeling process—is much too large to attempt to survey here, but a brief summary of some representative results is given in Sec. 8.1.1. Finally, the task of model validation often depends strongly on the details of the physical system being modelled and the ultimate application intended for the model. Consequently, detailed treatment of this topic also lies beyond the scope of this book but again, some representative results are discussed briefly in Sec. 8.1.3 and illustrated in the first case study (Sec. 8.2). Finally, Sec. 8.6 concludes both the chapter and the book with some philosophical observations on the problem of developing moderate-complexity, discrete-time dynamic models to approximate the behavior of high-complexity, continuous-time physical systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document