Acoustic velocities, elasticity, and pressure-induced elastic softening in compressed neodymium

2021 ◽  
Vol 155 ◽  
pp. 103776
Author(s):  
Yongtao Zou ◽  
Mu Li ◽  
Liwei Deng ◽  
Hua Zhang ◽  
Xiaoyang Guo ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Jones ◽  
Martin Trusler ◽  
Geoffery Maitland ◽  
Claudio Delle Piane ◽  
Ronny Pini

1995 ◽  
Vol 148 (1) ◽  
pp. 213-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. O. Chen ◽  
H. M. Shen ◽  
Y. N. Huang ◽  
B. Ju ◽  
Y. N. Wang

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-29
Author(s):  
Papia Nandi ◽  
Patrick Fulton ◽  
James Dale

As rising ocean temperatures can destabilize gas hydrate, identifying and characterizing large shallow hydrate bodies is increasingly important in order to understand their hazard potential. In the southwestern Gulf of Mexico, reanalysis of 3D seismic reflection data reveals evidence for the presence of six potentially large gas hydrate bodies located at shallow depths below the seafloor. We originally interpreted these bodies as salt, as they share common visual characteristics on seismic data with shallow allochthonous salt bodies, including high-impedance boundaries and homogenous interiors with very little acoustic reflectivity. However, when seismic images are constructed using acoustic velocities associated with salt, the resulting images were of poor quality containing excessive moveout in common reflection point (CRP) offset image gathers. Further investigation reveals that using lower-valued acoustic velocities results in higher quality images with little or no moveout. We believe that these lower acoustic values are representative of gas hydrate and not of salt. Directly underneath these bodies lies a zone of poor reflectivity, which is both typical and expected under hydrate. Observations of gas in a nearby well, other indicators of hydrate in the vicinity, and regional geologic context, all support the interpretation that these large bodies are composed of hydrate. The total equivalent volume of gas within these bodies is estimated to potentially be as large as 1.5 gigatons or 10.5 TCF, considering uncertainty for estimates of porosity and saturation, comparable to the entire proven natural gas reserves of Trinidad and Tobago in 2019.


2011 ◽  
Vol 96 (8-9) ◽  
pp. 1254-1261 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. K. H. Salje ◽  
D. J. Safarik ◽  
J. C. Lashley ◽  
L. A. Groat ◽  
U. Bismayer

1977 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 4370-4375 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Barmatz ◽  
L. R. Testardi ◽  
M. Eibschütz ◽  
H. J. Guggenheim

1988 ◽  
Vol 32 (01) ◽  
pp. 37-43
Author(s):  
Paul C. Xirouchakis

The solution is presented for an infinite elastic-softening floating beam under a point load. The response depends on two nondimensional parameters: the negative stiffness coefficient that characterizes the descending part of the moment-curvature curve, and the nondimensional softening region half-length. The solution exhibits two important features that the elastic-perfectly plastic solution does not show. First, in certain ranges of parameters, the elastic-softening beam has a clearly defined maximum load carrying capacity. Second, in some other ranges of parameters, the elastic-softening beam has a minimum load or residual strength. The beam stiffens up upon further deformation due to the reactions of the water foundation. Critical softening parameters are calculated that separate stable from unstable behavior.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document