scholarly journals The Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS) in infertile patients: A reliability and validity study

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 471-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saman Maroufizadeh ◽  
Reza Omani-Samani ◽  
Amir Almasi-Hashiani ◽  
Behnaz Navid ◽  
Bentolhoda Sobati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Assessment Scale ◽  
Validity Study ◽  
Relationship Assessment ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Infertile Patients

An Evaluation of the German Relationship Assessment Scale

2005 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 259-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Dinkel ◽  
Friedrich Balck
Keyword(s):  
Community Sample ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Dyadic Adjustment ◽  
Assessment Scale ◽  
General Factor ◽  
Satisfaction Scale ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Relationship Assessment ◽  
The Relationship

The Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS) is a short seven-item measure for the assessment of relationship satisfaction. It can be used with different types of relationships. We aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the German version of the RAS in a community sample of N = 145 persons. The principal component analysis revealed one general factor, which accounted for more than 60 per cent of the variance. The internal consistency of the RAS was high (α = .89). While there were no significant associations between RAS scores and age or gender, several other sociodemographic parameters had an impact on the RAS, e. g. presence of children. The RAS correlated significantly with scales of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), most impressively with the DAS satisfaction scale (r = .87). Persons living in a distressing relationship, as indicated by a DAS total score below 100, also had lower scores on the RAS. In conclusion, our results extend the evidence on the reliability and validity of the RAS.

scholarly journals The Korean Version of the Cognitive Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (K-CASP): A Reliability and Validity Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 362
Author(s):  
Kwon-Hee Park ◽  
Hee-Won Lee ◽  
Kee-Boem Park ◽  
Jin-Youn Lee ◽  
Ah-Ra Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Assessment ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Assessment Scale ◽  
Validity Study ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Korean Version

scholarly journals The Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale (G-SAS): A reliability and validity study

2009 ◽  
Vol 166 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suck Won Kim ◽  
Jon E. Grant ◽  
Marc N. Potenza ◽  
Carlos Blanco ◽  
Eric Hollander
Keyword(s):  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Assessment Scale ◽  
Validity Study ◽  
Symptom Assessment Scale

The utility of the relationship assessment scale in multiple types of relationships

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 435-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith D. Renshaw ◽  
Patrick McKnight ◽  
Catherine M. Caska ◽  
Rebecca K. Blais
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Scale ◽  
Relationship Assessment ◽  
The Relationship

The Relationship Assessment Scale

1998 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan S. Hendrick ◽  
Amy Dicke ◽  
Clyde Hendrick
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Scale ◽  
Relationship Assessment ◽  
The Relationship

Satisfaction in Consensual Nonmonogamy

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-121
Author(s):  
Curtis Garner ◽  
Melanie Person ◽  
Chelsi Goddard ◽  
Adrienne Patridge ◽  
Tara Bixby
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Scale ◽  
Satisfaction Level ◽  
Therapeutic Care ◽  
Relationship Assessment ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire

Inaccurate stigmas and stereotypes may prevent individuals involved in consensual nonmonogamous (CNM) relationships from getting the counseling they seek when facing relational issues. Misperceptions regarding the satisfaction level of individuals in CNM relationships may perpetuate stereotypes and complicate therapeutic care. The current research attempted to determine the satisfaction levels of those involved in CNM relationships using the Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS) and the Relational Assessment Questionnaire. Results of N = 150 find a mean of 4.12 (0.76) on the RAS for the CNM group indicating no difference in satisfaction between the CNM sample and individuals identifying as monogamous. This research offers important considerations for counselors in reviewing biases and judgments they may hold in working with this population and contributes to the dearth of literature on CNM populations.

Measuring the Differences in Pairs' Marital Forgiveness Scores: Construct Validity and Links with Relationship Satisfaction

2014 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 479-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asli Bugay
Keyword(s):  
Relationship Satisfaction ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Married Couples ◽  
Turkish Version ◽  
Positive Dimension ◽  
Dispositional Forgiveness ◽  
Negative Dimension ◽  
Relationship Assessment ◽  
Marital Forgiveness ◽  
The Relationship

This study examined the reliability and validity of a Turkish version for the Marital Dispositional Forgiveness Scale (MDFS). 104 married couples ( M age = 36.6 yr., SD = 9.4) living in Turkey completed the Turkish versions of the MDFS and the Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS). Cronbach's coefficients α for negative dimension (wives =. 82, husbands =. 80) and positive dimension (wives =. 80, husbands = .79) were adequate. A correlation between the MDFS and RAS scores indicated significant associations, stronger for the positive dimension than the negative dimension, supporting the external validity of the MDFS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document