scholarly journals Pulse wave velocity with 4D flow MRI: Systematic differences and age-related regional vascular stiffness

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1266-1271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petter Dyverfeldt ◽  
Tino Ebbers ◽  
Toste Länne
2021 ◽  
pp. 0271678X2110087
Author(s):  
Cecilia Björnfot ◽  
Anders Garpebring ◽  
Sara Qvarlander ◽  
Jan Malm ◽  
Anders Eklund ◽  
...  

Intracranial arterial stiffening is a potential early marker of emerging cerebrovascular dysfunction and could be mechanistically involved in disease processes detrimental to brain function via several pathways. A prominent consequence of arterial wall stiffening is the increased velocity at which the systolic pressure pulse wave propagates through the vasculature. Previous non-invasive measurements of the pulse wave propagation have been performed on the aorta or extracranial arteries with results linking increased pulse wave velocity to brain pathology. However, there is a lack of intracranial “target-organ” measurements. Here we present a 4D flow MRI method to estimate pulse wave velocity in the intracranial vascular tree. The method utilizes the full detectable branching structure of the cerebral vascular tree in an optimization framework that exploits small temporal shifts that exists between waveforms sampled at varying depths in the vasculature. The method is shown to be stable in an internal consistency test, and of sufficient sensitivity to robustly detect age-related increases in intracranial pulse wave velocity.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 674-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Ruesink ◽  
Rafael Medero ◽  
David Rutkowski ◽  
Alejandro Roldán-Alzate

2022 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 103259
Author(s):  
Joaquín Mura ◽  
Julio Sotelo ◽  
Hernán Mella ◽  
James Wong ◽  
Tarique Hussain ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Kelly Jarvis ◽  
Michael B. Scott ◽  
Gilles Soulat ◽  
Mohammed S. M. Elbaz ◽  
Alex J. Barker ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 0271678X2091030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo A Rivera-Rivera ◽  
Karly A Cody ◽  
Laura Eisenmenger ◽  
Paul Cary ◽  
Howard A Rowley ◽  
...  

Clinical evidence shows vascular factors may co-occur and complicate the expression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD); yet, the pathologic mechanisms and involvement of different compartments of the vascular network are not well understood. Diseases such as arteriosclerosis diminish vascular compliance and will lead to arterial stiffness, a well-established risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity. Arterial stiffness can be assessed using pulse wave velocity (PWV); however, this is usually done from carotid-to-femoral artery ratios. To probe the brain vasculature, intracranial PWV measures would be ideal. In this study, high temporal resolution 4D flow MRI was used to assess transcranial PWV in 160 subjects including AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), healthy controls, and healthy subjects with apolipoprotein ɛ4 positivity (APOE4+) and parental history of AD dementia (FH+). High temporal resolution imaging was achieved by high temporal binning of retrospectively gated data using a local-low rank approach. Significantly higher transcranial PWV in AD dementia and MCI subjects was found when compared to old-age-matched controls (AD vs. old-age-matched controls: P <0.001, AD vs. MCI: P = 0.029, MCI vs. old-age-matched controls P = 0.013). Furthermore, vascular changes were found in clinically healthy middle-age adults with APOE4+ and FH+ indicating significantly higher transcranial PWV compared to controls ( P <0.001).


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aya Lafta ◽  
Aminu Bello ◽  
Sara Davison ◽  
Stephanie Thompson ◽  
Branko Braam

Abstract Background and Aims Fluid overload and vascular stiffness are two independent predictors of cardiovascular events in hemodialysis (HD) patients. To date, observational and interventional studies that investigated the effect of inter- and intradialytic fluid overload changes on vascular stiffness in HD patients are very limited. We performed a scoping review to explore existing reports about effects of fluid overload on vascular stiffness in adults receiving HD treatment and to identify knowledge gaps for future research. Method We followed the framework originally developed by Arksey and O’Malley. We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Database of systematic reviews from inception to October 29, 2019. References of review papers were screened for relevant studies not identified from the initial search until saturation is achieved. Results Of 666 eligible studies, nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. These included clinical observational studies (n=16) and randomized controlled trials (n=3). In general, most of the identified studies had small sample size and short term of follow up. Studies use different definitions of fluid overload and vascular stiffness. Measures of relative fluid overload like the ratio of extracellular fluid/intracellular fluid, fluid overload/extracellular fluid, and/or extracellular fluid/total body fluid were used as a representative of fluid status. Pulse wave velocity and augmentation index were used interchangeably as vascular stiffness measures. The accumulated findings were inconsistent and inconclusive. There was no consensus whether intradialytic fluid volume changes affected vascular stiffness. In the majority of the observational studies, a decrease in pulse wave velocity or augmentation index correlated with a decrease in blood pressure after fluid correction by HD treatment. The randomized clinical trials used different methods and technologies for the correction of fluid overload, thereby, results were conflicting. Conclusion Current literature is insufficient to justify whether fluid overload changes have a direct effect on vascular stiffness in HD patients. The findings were conflicting which limits the comparisons of studies and generalization of findings. These knowledge gaps urge the need for further clinical studies to enhance the understanding and to improve the quality of research in this topic. This includes standardized definitions and methodologies as well as longer term of follow up.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 391-398
Author(s):  
E. A. Praskurnichiy ◽  
I. E. Minyukhina

Objective. The objective of our study was to compare the performance of vascular stiffness (VS) and the left ventricular (LV) remodeling process indicators in patients with arterial hypertension (AH) under renal replacement therapy (RRT), and patients with essential hypertension.Design and methods. 158 people were included in the study, divided into 4 comparable age groups: 32 patients receiving programmed hemodialysis (PH), 37 recipients of renal transplant (RT), 69 patients with essential AH and 20 healthy volunteers. All the patients underwent 24-hour blood pressure (BP) monitoring with an assessment of VS and central BP (SBPao) and echocardiography (EchoCG).Results. The patients under PH and after RT did not have any significant differences in the values of central and peripheral BP. Comparing the groups of patients under RRT with the group of essential AH, the office systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP values did not differ significantly. Аlthough, at night, considerably higher DBP(n) and SBPao(n) values were detected in patients under RRT, and in the patients after RT SBP(n) and PP(n) values were also increased. An increase in the SBPao values of more than 10 m/sec was detected only in the groups of patients under RRT. In all the groups with hypertension all indicators of daily VS differed significantly from the group of healthy volunteers. PTIN (Pulse Time Index of Norm) in the studied groups had more evident differences: in the healthy volunteers it was in the range of 80-90%, in the patients with essential hypertension — 50-60%, and in the patients under PH and after RT — 20-40%. In all groups of patients with AH, the average the posterior wall thickness (PWT) of the LV and the interventricular septum thickness (IVST) were close to the upper limit of the norm. In the groups of patients with AH an increase in the relative wall thickness (RWT) of the LV was also detected. Furthermore, considerably higher the values of ILVmass, IVST were found in the group of patients on PH in comparison with the patients after RT. In addition, in all the groups of patients with AH, there was a tendency to LV spherification in comparison with the healthy volunteers, and in the group of essential AH the difference was more pronounced compared with the group under RRT.Conclusion. In the patients with arterial hypertension who undergo renal replacement therapy, higher average values of central BP, higher vascular stiffness (daily pulse wave velocity in the aorta and a longer period of pulse wave velocity increase in the aorta during the day (PTIN)) and less pronounced left ventricular spherification are recorded in comparison with the patients with essential hypertension while office BP values remained consistent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document