Proton selective anode nanochannel for efficient methanol utilization

Nano Today ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 101213
Author(s):  
Houhe Pan ◽  
Zhongqing Jiang ◽  
Zicheng Zuo ◽  
Feng He ◽  
Fan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 293-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Sibirny ◽  
V. I. Titorenko ◽  
M. V. Gonchar ◽  
V. M. Ubiyvovk ◽  
G. P. Ksheminskaya ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 245 ◽  
pp. 1407-1412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongxue Dai ◽  
Honglian Gu ◽  
Shangjie Zhang ◽  
Fengxue Xin ◽  
Wenming Zhang ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 179 (5) ◽  
pp. 315-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melike Balk ◽  
Jan Weijma ◽  
Michael W. Friedrich ◽  
Alfons J. M. Stams
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Kyle Bennett ◽  
Gwendolyn J. Gregory ◽  
Jacqueline E. Gonzalez ◽  
Jie Ren Gerald Har ◽  
Maciek R. Antoniewicz ◽  
...  

There is great interest in developing synthetic methylotrophs that harbor methane and methanol utilization pathways in heterologous hosts such as Escherichia coli for industrial bioconversion of one-carbon compounds. While there are recent reports that describe the successful engineering of synthetic methylotrophs, additional efforts are required to achieve the robust methylotrophic phenotypes required for industrial realization. Here, we address an important issue of synthetic methylotrophy in E. coli: methanol toxicity. Both methanol, and its oxidation product, formaldehyde, are cytotoxic to cells. Methanol alters the fluidity and biological properties of cellular membranes while formaldehyde reacts readily with proteins and nucleic acids. Thus, efforts to enhance the methanol tolerance of synthetic methylotrophs are important. Here, adaptive laboratory evolution was performed to improve the methanol tolerance of several E. coli strains, both methylotrophic and non-methylotrophic. Serial batch passaging in rich medium containing toxic methanol concentrations yielded clones exhibiting improved methanol tolerance. In several cases, these evolved clones exhibited a > 50% improvement in growth rate and biomass yield in the presence of high methanol concentrations compared to the respective parental strains. Importantly, one evolved clone exhibited a two to threefold improvement in the methanol utilization phenotype, as determined via 13C-labeling, at non-toxic, industrially relevant methanol concentrations compared to the respective parental strain. Whole genome sequencing was performed to identify causative mutations contributing to methanol tolerance. Common mutations were identified in 30S ribosomal subunit proteins, which increased translational accuracy and provided insight into a novel methanol tolerance mechanism. This study addresses an important issue of synthetic methylotrophy in E. coli and provides insight as to how methanol toxicity can be alleviated via enhancing methanol tolerance. Coupled improvement of methanol tolerance and synthetic methanol utilization is an important advancement for the field of synthetic methylotrophy.


1998 ◽  
Vol 180 (11) ◽  
pp. 2958-2967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppinia Parpinello ◽  
Enrico Berardi ◽  
Rosanna Strabbioli

ABSTRACT Mutant LGM-128 of Hansenula polymorpha harbors the recessive mutation glr2-1 which confers a complex pleiotropic phenotype, the major feature of which is the metabolically unnecessary induction of methanol utilization metabolism (C1 metabolism) during growth on glucose, whether or not methanol is in the medium. Therefore, in this mutant, peroxisomes are formed and proliferate upon cultivation in glucose-containing media. In these media, LGM-128 shows induction levels of C1metabolism that are similar to those observed in methanol-containing media. This indicates that GLR2 controls the repression-derepression process stimulated by glucose and that the induction process triggered by methanol plays only a minor role in activating C1 metabolism. Cultivating LGM-128 in methanol and then transferring it to glucose media revealed that active degradative processes occur, leading to the disappearance of C1 metabolism. This observation suggests that, although stimulated by glucose, the two processes are controlled by elements which are, at least in part, distinct. Finally, glr2-1 does not affect ethanol repression, suggesting that in H. polymorpha the two repressing circuits are separated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document