A putative high risk diplotype of the G72 gene is in healthy individuals associated with better performance in working memory functions and altered brain activity in the medial temporal lobe

NeuroImage ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 1002-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Jansen ◽  
Sören Krach ◽  
Axel Krug ◽  
Valentin Markov ◽  
Thomas Eggermann ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan D. Wagner ◽  
Viviane Sziklas ◽  
Krista E. Garver ◽  
Marilyn Jones-Gotman

2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 536-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
PABLO CAMPO ◽  
FERNANDO MAESTÚ ◽  
IRENE GARCÍA-MORALES ◽  
ANTONIO GIL-NAGEL ◽  
BRYAN STRANGE ◽  
...  

AbstractIt has been traditionally assumed that medial temporal lobe (MTL) is not required for working memory (WM). However, animal lesion and electrophysiological studies and human neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies have provided increasing evidences of a critical involvement of MTL in WM. Based on previous findings, the central aim of this study was to investigate the contribution of the MTL to verbal WM encoding. Here, we used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to compare the patterns of MTL activation of 9 epilepsy patients suffering from left hippocampal sclerosis with those of 10 healthy matched controls while they performed a verbal WM task. MEG recordings allow detailed tracking of the time course of MTL activation. We observed impaired WM performance associated with changes in the dynamics of MTL activity in epilepsy patients. Specifically, whereas patients showed decreased activity in damaged MTL, activity in the contralateral MTL was enhanced, an effect that became significant in the 600- to 700-ms interval after stimulus presentation. These findings strongly support the crucial contribution of MTL to verbal WM encoding and provide compelling evidence for the proposal that MTL contributes to both episodic memory and WM. Whether this pattern is signaling reorganization or a normal use of a damaged structure is discussed. (JINS, 2009, 15, 536–546.)


2011 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. e382
Author(s):  
Masato Inoue ◽  
Masafumi Nejime ◽  
Akichika Mikami

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 3584-3589 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Jeneson ◽  
J. T. Wixted ◽  
R. O. Hopkins ◽  
L. R. Squire

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Steel ◽  
Edward H. Silson ◽  
Charlotte J. Stagg ◽  
Chris I. Baker

AbstractReward and punishment shape behavior, but the mechanisms underlying their effect on skill learning are not well understood. Here, we tested whether the functional connectivity of premotor cortex (PMC), a region known to be critical for learning of sequencing skills, is altered after training by reward or punishment given during training. Resting-state fMRI was collected in two experiments before and after participants trained on either a serial reaction time task (SRTT; n = 36) or force-tracking task (FTT; n = 36) with reward, punishment, or control feedback. In each experiment, training-related change in PMC functional connectivity was compared across feedback groups. In both tasks, reward and punishment differentially affected PMC functional connectivity. On the SRTT, participants trained with reward showed an increase in functional connectivity between PMC and cerebellum as well as PMC and striatum, while participants trained with punishment showed an increase in functional connectivity between PMC and medial temporal lobe connectivity. After training on the FTT, subjects trained with control and reward showed increases in PMC connectivity with parietal and temporal cortices after training, while subjects trained with punishment showed increased PMC connectivity with ventral striatum. While the results from the two experiments overlapped in some areas, including ventral pallidum, temporal lobe, and cerebellum, these regions showed diverging patterns of results across the two tasks for the different feedback conditions. These findings suggest that reward and punishment strongly influence spontaneous brain activity after training, and that the regions implicated depend on the task learned.


2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 362-362
Author(s):  
K. S. Moore ◽  
A. Chatterjee ◽  
K. Page ◽  
M. Verfaellie ◽  
I. R. Olson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document