scholarly journals How number line estimation skills relate to neural activations in single digit subtraction problems

NeuroImage ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 198-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Berteletti ◽  
G. Man ◽  
J.R. Booth
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Bahnmueller ◽  
Stefan Huber ◽  
Korbinian Moeller ◽  
Hans-Christoph Nuerk

2021 ◽  
pp. 001440292110088
Author(s):  
Madhavi Jayanthi ◽  
Russell Gersten ◽  
Robin F. Schumacher ◽  
Joseph Dimino ◽  
Keith Smolkowski ◽  
...  

Using a randomized controlled trial, we examined the effect of a fractions intervention for students experiencing mathematical difficulties in Grade 5. Students who were eligible for the study ( n = 205) were randomly assigned to intervention and comparison conditions, blocked by teacher. The intervention used systematic, explicit instruction and relied on linear representations (e.g., Cuisenaire Rods and number lines) to demonstrate key fractions concepts. Enhancing students’ mathematical explanations was also a focus. Results indicated that intervention students significantly outperformed students from the comparison condition on measures of fractions proficiency and understanding ( g = 0.66–0.78), number line estimation ( g = 0.80–1.08), fractions procedures ( g = 1.07), and explanation tasks ( g = 0.68–1.23). Findings suggest that interventions designed to include explicit instruction, along with consistent use of the number line and opportunities to explain reasoning, can promote students’ proficiency and understanding of fractions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 1467-1484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Schneider ◽  
Simon Merz ◽  
Johannes Stricker ◽  
Bert De Smedt ◽  
Joke Torbeyns ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 1493-1502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenna L. Wall ◽  
Clarissa A. Thompson ◽  
John Dunlosky ◽  
William E. Merriman

2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-294
Author(s):  
Sabrina Michelle Di Lonardo ◽  
Matthew G Huebner ◽  
Katherine Newman ◽  
Jo-Anne LeFevre

Adults ( N = 72) estimated the location of target numbers on number lines that varied in numerical range (i.e., typical range 0–10,000 or atypical range 0–7,000) and spatial orientation (i.e., the 0 endpoint on the left [traditional] or on the right [reversed]). Eye-tracking data were used to assess strategy use. Participants made meaningful first fixations on the line, with fixations occurring around the origin for low target numbers and around the midpoint and endpoint for high target numbers. On traditional direction number lines, participants used left-to-right scanning and showed a leftward bias; these effects were reduced for the reverse direction number lines. Participants made fixations around the midpoint for both ranges but were less accurate when estimating target numbers around the midpoint on the 7,000-range number line. Thus, participants are using the internal benchmark (i.e., midpoint) to guide estimates on atypical range number lines, but they have difficulty calculating the midpoint, leading to less accurate estimates. In summary, both range and direction influenced strategy use and accuracy, suggesting that both numerical and spatial processes influence number line estimation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (S1) ◽  
pp. 359-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina M. Reinert ◽  
Stefan Huber ◽  
Hans-Christoph Nuerk ◽  
Korbinian Moeller

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document