Associations of Number Line Estimation With Mathematical Competence: A Meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 1467-1484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Schneider ◽  
Simon Merz ◽  
Johannes Stricker ◽  
Bert De Smedt ◽  
Joke Torbeyns ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexa Ellis ◽  
María Inés Susperreguy ◽  
David J. Purpura ◽  
Pamela E. Davis-Kean

A recent meta-analysis demonstrated the overall correlation between the number line estimation (NLE) task and children’s mathematical competence was r = .44 (positively recoded), and this relation increased with age. The goal of the current study was to conceptually replicate and extend these results by further synthesizing this correlation utilizing studies not present in the meta-analysis. Across seven studies, 954 participants, ranging from 3 to 11 years old (Age M = 6.02 years, SD = 1.57), the overall estimation-competence correlations were similar to those of the meta-analysis and ranged from r = −.40 to −.35. The current conceptual replication demonstrated that the meta-analysis captured a stable overall relation between performance on the NLE task and mathematical competence. However, the current study failed to replicate the same moderation of age group presented in the meta-analysis. Furthermore, the current study extended results by assessing the stability and predictive validity of the NLE task while controlling for covariates. Results suggested that the NLE task demonstrated poor stability and predictive validity in the seven samples present in this study. Thus, although concurrent relations replicated, the differential age moderation, lack of stability, and lack of predictive validity in these studies require a more nuanced approach to understanding the utility of the NLE task. Future research should focus on understanding the connection between children’s developmental progression and NLE measurement before further investigating the predictive and diagnostic importance of the task for broader mathematical competence.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Bahnmueller ◽  
Stefan Huber ◽  
Korbinian Moeller ◽  
Hans-Christoph Nuerk

2021 ◽  
pp. 001440292110088
Author(s):  
Madhavi Jayanthi ◽  
Russell Gersten ◽  
Robin F. Schumacher ◽  
Joseph Dimino ◽  
Keith Smolkowski ◽  
...  

Using a randomized controlled trial, we examined the effect of a fractions intervention for students experiencing mathematical difficulties in Grade 5. Students who were eligible for the study ( n = 205) were randomly assigned to intervention and comparison conditions, blocked by teacher. The intervention used systematic, explicit instruction and relied on linear representations (e.g., Cuisenaire Rods and number lines) to demonstrate key fractions concepts. Enhancing students’ mathematical explanations was also a focus. Results indicated that intervention students significantly outperformed students from the comparison condition on measures of fractions proficiency and understanding ( g = 0.66–0.78), number line estimation ( g = 0.80–1.08), fractions procedures ( g = 1.07), and explanation tasks ( g = 0.68–1.23). Findings suggest that interventions designed to include explicit instruction, along with consistent use of the number line and opportunities to explain reasoning, can promote students’ proficiency and understanding of fractions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 1493-1502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenna L. Wall ◽  
Clarissa A. Thompson ◽  
John Dunlosky ◽  
William E. Merriman

2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-294
Author(s):  
Sabrina Michelle Di Lonardo ◽  
Matthew G Huebner ◽  
Katherine Newman ◽  
Jo-Anne LeFevre

Adults ( N = 72) estimated the location of target numbers on number lines that varied in numerical range (i.e., typical range 0–10,000 or atypical range 0–7,000) and spatial orientation (i.e., the 0 endpoint on the left [traditional] or on the right [reversed]). Eye-tracking data were used to assess strategy use. Participants made meaningful first fixations on the line, with fixations occurring around the origin for low target numbers and around the midpoint and endpoint for high target numbers. On traditional direction number lines, participants used left-to-right scanning and showed a leftward bias; these effects were reduced for the reverse direction number lines. Participants made fixations around the midpoint for both ranges but were less accurate when estimating target numbers around the midpoint on the 7,000-range number line. Thus, participants are using the internal benchmark (i.e., midpoint) to guide estimates on atypical range number lines, but they have difficulty calculating the midpoint, leading to less accurate estimates. In summary, both range and direction influenced strategy use and accuracy, suggesting that both numerical and spatial processes influence number line estimation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (S1) ◽  
pp. 359-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina M. Reinert ◽  
Stefan Huber ◽  
Hans-Christoph Nuerk ◽  
Korbinian Moeller

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document