Imaging of the Postoperative Jaws and Temporomandibular Joints

2022 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-229
Author(s):  
Dania Tamimi ◽  
Michael Gunson
2019 ◽  
pp. 84-92
Author(s):  
Anh Chi Phan ◽  
Xuan Anh Ngoc Ho

Background: The condylar position discrepancy between centric relation and maximal intercuspation has been still a controversial issue. Aims: To compare the condylar position between centric relation and maximal intercuspation using cone-beam tomography in patients without temporomandibular joints disorder. Materials and methods: To assess the condylar position in centric relation and maximal intercuspation using cone-beam tomography on 40 fifth-year and sixth-year dental students of Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy without temporomandibular joints disorder. The condylar positions are assessed following Sener classification (2009) and are compared between centric relation and maximal intercuspation using pairedsamples t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test. Results: Among 480 condye-to-fossa measurement pairs, there are 91.2% pairs having difference between two reference position but there is no significant difference. The condylar position at the superior of mandibular fossa has the greatest percentage in both centric relation and maximal intercuspation (43.8% in centric relation and 51.2% in maximal intercuspation). This greatest percentage is followed by the condylar position at posterior of mandibular fossa (32.5% in centric relation and 36.3% in maximal intercuspation). Lastly, the condylar position at the anterior of mandibular fossa has the fewest percentage (23.7% in centric relation and 12.5% in maximal intercuspation). Conclusion: There is no significant difference of condylar position between centric relation and maximal intercuspation in patients without temporomandibular joints disorder. Key words: Condylar position, centric relation, maximal intercuspation, cone-beam tomography


2020 ◽  
Vol 146 (3) ◽  
pp. 622-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Nunez-Villaveiran ◽  
Vahe Fahradyan ◽  
Edoardo Dalla Pozza ◽  
Majid Rezaei ◽  
Richard L. Drake ◽  
...  

Oral Diseases ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuejiao Zhang ◽  
Qian Liu ◽  
Xiaojie Xu ◽  
Peng Zhou ◽  
Hongyun Zhang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingheng Shu ◽  
Quanyi Wang ◽  
Desmond Y.R. Chong ◽  
Zhan Liu

AbstractLoadings in temporomandibular joints (TMJs) are essential factors in dysfunction of TMJs, and are barely noticed in treatment of maxillofacial deformity. The only approach, which can access stresses in TMJs, could expend day’s even weeks to complete. The objective of the study was to compare the differences of the morphological and biomechanical characteristics of TMJs between asymptomatic subjects and patients with mandibular prognathism, and to preliminarily analyze the connection between the two kinds of characteristics. Morphological measurements and finite element analysis (FEA) corresponding to the central occlusion were carried out on the models of 13 mandibular prognathism patients and 10 asymptomatic subjects. The results indicated that the joint spaces of the patients were significantly lower than those of the asymptomatic subjects, while the stresses of patients were significantly greater than those of asymptomatic subjects, especially the stresses on discs. The results of Pearson correlation analysis showed that weak or no correlations were found between the von Mises stresses and the joint spaces of asymptomatic subjects, while moderate, even high correlations were found in the patients. Thus, it was shown to be a feasible way to use morphological parameters to predict the internal loads of TMJs.


2016 ◽  
Vol 74 (9) ◽  
pp. e18 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.M. Resnick ◽  
P. Vakilian ◽  
D. Zurakowski ◽  
M. Breen ◽  
L.B. Kaban ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document