Introduction:
Brain perfusion imaging has become an integral part of acute stroke therapy, especially for the extended time window. A streamlined workflow is essential to reduce delays in acute stroke therapy. Incorporating standard and advanced imaging together may reduce time to endovascular therapy but may delay administration of intravenous (IV) tPA.
Method:
A retrospective analysis of all acute stroke therapy cases between August 2017 and March of 2018 was performed at a single stroke center. Brain perfusion imaging was instituted into the workflow in December of 2017. We included patients who received IV tPA before and after implementation of CT perfusion (CT-P). Demographics, clinical presentation, stroke treatment times and imaging characteristics were collected.
Results:
During the eight-month period, we identified 117 patients who met inclusion criteria. We divided the cohort into two groups, pre CT-P implementation (Group 1) and post CT-P implementation (Group 2). We identified 66 patients in Group 1 and 51 patients in Group 2. In Group 1, 29 (44%) were females with median age of 63 years. In Group 2, 33 (65%) were females, with median age of 72 years. There was no difference in median times for door to needle in Group 1 (57 minutes, interquartile range [IQR] 42 – 76) compared to Group 2 (53 minutes, [IQR] 40 – 68) (
P
= 0.20).
Conclusion:
Incorporating CT-P in the imaging workflow did not delay door to needle time for IV tPA in acute stroke therapy.
Brain Perfusion Imaging in Neonates