Validity of the γ-Ray Evaluation with iodoamphetamine for Cerebral Blood Flow Assessment (REICA) method for quantification of cerebral blood flow including acetazolamide challenge test

Objective The γ-Ray Evaluation with iodoamphetamine for Cerebral Blood Flow Assessment (REICA) is a new method for quantifying cerebral blood flow (CBF) using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and [123I]N-isopropyl-p-iodoamphetamine (123I-IMP). The present study aimed to validate the REICA method using data including acetazolamide challenge test. Methods The REICA and Graph-Plot (GP) methods were used to calculate mean CBF (mCBF) for 92 acquisitions (rest: 57, stress: 35) and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in 33 patients. To obtain stress data, 15 mg/kg of acetazolamide was injected intravenously 10 min before the administration of 123I-IMP, and blood samples were collected under the same conditions as rest data. The reference standard was the Autoradiograph (ARG) method using arterial blood sampling, and the accuracy of the REICA method was analyzed by comparing it with each method. Results For mCBF, the correlation coefficients (r) were 0.792 for the REICA method and 0.636 for the GP method. For CVR, r values were 0.660 for the REICA method and 0.578 for the GP method. In both acquisitions, the REICA method had a stronger correlation with the ARG method than the GP method. For mCBF, there was a significant difference in the correlation coefficient between the two correlation coefficients (p < 0.01). Conclusions The REICA method was more accurate than the GP method in quantifying CBF and closer to the ARG method. The REICA method, which is a noninvasive method of cerebral blood flow quantification using 123I-IMP, has great medical usefulness.

Preoperative Acetazolamide Challenge in Pediatric Chiari I Malformation

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> In patients who present with headaches and Chiari 1 malformation without cranial nerve or brainstem dysfunction or syrinx formation, the decision to decompress can be difficult to make. We present a case series examining the use of acetazolamide as a diagnostic aid to determine candidacy for decompression. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A single pediatric neurosurgeon’s (M.M.H.) experience from 2003 to 2018 was retrospectively reviewed. All cases evaluated in the clinic for CPT code of Chiari 1 malformation were analyzed. Inclusion criteria were patients with diagnosis of Chiari 1 malformation and headache-predominant symptoms who underwent an acetazolamide challenge test. Exclusion criteria included age over 18, syrinx, or significant clinical evidence of brainstem compression or cranial nerve dysfunction. Data were recorded with respect to response to acetazolamide. Surgical outcomes were assessed using the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale (CCOS) pain category and the improve/same/worse (IWS) scale. Overall satisfaction from surgery was also recorded. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Forty-five patients met inclusion criteria and underwent acetazolamide challenge. Thirty-three (73.3%) patients showed improvement of their symptoms with acetazolamide challenge (responders). Of the 33 responders, 25 (75.8%) underwent Chiari decompression. The remaining 8 (24.2%) responders experienced persistent improvement of their symptoms after the acetazolamide trial and did not require intervention. Twelve (26.7%) patients did not improve with acetazolamide (nonresponders) of which 11 (91.7% of nonreponders) never required intervention. One nonresponder eventually underwent Chiari decompression due to progressively worsening and debilitating headaches. All twenty-five (100%) responders improved after surgery and 24 (96%) were satisfied with the outcome of surgery. The average responder CCOS pain score was 3.52 out of 4. The nonresponder who did not improve with acetazolamide had persistent severe headaches after decompression. The CCOS pain score for this nonresponder was 2 out of 4. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Pediatric headache-predominant Chiari 1 malformation presents a difficult diagnostic dilemma. The authors describe a trial of acetazolamide as a preoperative diagnostic tool to aid the decision to decompress. Further studies will need to be performed to determine the effectiveness of preoperative acetazolamide in identifying which patients may benefit from surgical decompression.

Regional resting state perfusion variability and delayed cerebrovascular uniform reactivity in subjects with chronic carotid artery stenosis

The aim of this study was to assess regional perfusion at baseline and regional cerebrovascular resistance (CVR) to delayed acetazolamide challenge in subjects with chronic carotid artery stenosis.Sixteen patients (ten males) aged 70.94±7.71 with carotid artery stenosis ≥90% on the ipsilateral side and ≤50% on the contralateral side were enrolled into the study. In all patients, two computed tomography perfusion examinations were carried out; the first was performed before acetazolamide administration and the second 60 minutes after injection.The differences between mean values were examined by paired two-sample t-test and alternative nonparametric Wilcoxon’s test. Normality assumption was examined using W Shapiro-Wilk test.The lowest resting-state cerebral blood flow (CBF) was observed in white matter (ipsilateral side: 18.4±6.2; contralateral side: 19.3±6.6) and brainstem (ipsilateral side: 27.8±8.5; contralateral side: 29.1±10.8). Grey matter (cerebral cortex) resting state CBF was below the normal value for subjects of this age: frontal lobe – ipsilateral side: 30.4±7.0, contralateral side: 33.7±7.1; parietal lobe – ipsilateral side: 36.4±11.3, contralateral side: 42.7±9.9; temporal lobe – ipsilateral side: 32.5±8.6, contralateral side: 39.4±10.8; occipital lobe – ipsilateral side: 24.0±6.0, contralateral side: 26.4±6.6). The highest resting state CBF was observed in the insula (ipsilateral side: 49.2±17.4; contralateral side: 55.3±18.4). A relatively high resting state CBF was also recorded in the thalamus (ipsilateral side: 39.7±16.9; contralateral side: 41.7±14.1) and cerebellum (ipsilateral side: 41.4±12.2; contralateral side: 38.1±11.3). The highest CVR was observed in temporal lobe cortex (ipsilateral side: +27.1%; contralateral side: +26.1%) and cerebellum (ipsilateral side: +27.0%; contralateral side: +34.6%). The lowest CVR was recorded in brain stem (ipsilateral side: +20.2%; contralateral side: +22.2%) and white matter (ipsilateral side: +18.1%; contralateral side: +18.3%). All CBF values were provided in milliliters of blood per minute per 100 g of brain tissue [ml/100g/min]. Resting state circulation in subjects with carotid artery stenosis is low in all analysed structures with the exception of insula and cerebellum. Acetazolamide challenge yields relatively uniform response in both hemispheres in the investigated population.Grey matter is more reactive to acetazolamide challenge than white matter or brainstem.