Application of flat panel digital imaging for improvement of ocular melanoma patient set-up in proton beam therapy

2009 ◽  
Vol 598 (2) ◽  
pp. 628-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inder K. Daftari ◽  
Timothy Essert ◽  
Theodore L. Phillips
Keyword(s):  
Proton Beam ◽  
Digital Imaging ◽  
Melanoma Patient ◽  
Proton Beam Therapy ◽  
Ocular Melanoma ◽  
Flat Panel ◽  
Set Up

scholarly journals Assessment of set up accuracy using an evacuated cushion for proton beam therapy

Radiography ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. S8
Author(s):  
David Roberts ◽  
Cynthia Eccles ◽  
Mathew Lowe ◽  
Laura Elliff ◽  
Kamal Allen
Keyword(s):  
Proton Beam ◽  
Proton Beam Therapy ◽  
Set Up

Feasibility of Proton Beam Therapy for Ocular Melanoma Using a Novel 3D Treatment Planning Technique

2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 353-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
William F. Hartsell ◽  
Rashmi Kapur ◽  
Siobhan O’Connor Hartsell ◽  
Patrick Sweeney ◽  
Caitlin Lopes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Proton Beam ◽  
Proton Beam Therapy ◽  
Ocular Melanoma ◽  
3D Treatment Planning ◽  
Planning Technique

Decreased incidence of neovascular glaucoma by sparing anterior structures of the eye for proton beam therapy of ocular melanoma

2004 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. S311-S312 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.R. Rajendran ◽  
V. Weinberg ◽  
I.K. Daftari ◽  
J.R. Castro ◽  
J.M. Quivey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proton Beam ◽  
Proton Beam Therapy ◽  
Neovascular Glaucoma ◽  
Ocular Melanoma

scholarly journals Examining the frequency and concomitant dose of geometric verification imaging for patients undergoing proton beam therapy for ocular tumours; an audit of current clinical practice

BJR|Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 20210015
Author(s):  
Kate Shrewsbury-Gee ◽  
Daniel Kelly ◽  
Mike Kirby
Keyword(s):  
Proton Beam ◽  
Clinical Audit ◽  
Absorbed Dose ◽  
Proton Beam Therapy ◽  
Additional Imaging ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Image Pairs ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Collimated Beam ◽  
Geometric Verification

Objectives: This paper uses clinical audit to determine the extent and dosimetric impact of additional imaging for patients undergoing ocular proton beam therapy who have no clips visible in the collimated beam. Methods: An audit was conducted on 399 patients treated at The National Centre for Eye Proton Therapy between 3 July 2017 and 14 June 2019. The mean total number of image pairs over the course of treatment for patients with and without clips visible in the collimated beam were compared. Results: Among 364 evaluable patients, 333 had clips visible in the collimated beam and 31 did not. There was a statistically significant increase of five image pairs required for patients with no clips visible compared with those with clips visible (mean 14.6 vs 9.6 image pairs, respectively; p = 2.74 × 10–6). This equated to an additional 1.5 mGy absorbed dose, representing an increase in secondary cancer induction risk from 0.0004 to 0.0007%. Conclusions: The small increase in concomitant dose and set-up time for patients with no clips visible in the collimated beam is not clinically significant. Advances in knowledge: This novel work highlights clinical audit from real on-treatment geometric verification data and frequencies, rather than protocols, for ocular proton beam therapy; something not present in the literature. The simple and straightforward methodology is easily and equally applicable to clinical audits (especially those under Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations) for photon techniques.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document