Elective supraomohyoid neck dissection for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: Is dissection of sublevel IIB necessary?

Oral Oncology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed N. Elsheikh ◽  
Alessandra Rinaldo ◽  
Alfio Ferlito ◽  
Johannes J. Fagan ◽  
Carlos Suárez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Oral Cavity ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Neck Dissection ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Supraomohyoid Neck Dissection

Supraomohyoid neck dissection in the treatment of T1/T2 squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity

1994 ◽  
Vol 168 (5) ◽  
pp. 391-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Kligerman ◽  
Roberto A. Lima ◽  
Jose R. Soares ◽  
Lygia Prado ◽  
Fernando L. Dias ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Oral Cavity ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Neck Dissection ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Supraomohyoid Neck Dissection

Do demographics and tumour-related factors affect nodal yield at neck dissection? A retrospective cohort study

2016 ◽  
Vol 131 (S1) ◽  
pp. S36-S40 ◽  
Author(s):  
R S Lim ◽  
L Evans ◽  
A P George ◽  
N de Alwis ◽  
P Stimpson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Oral Cavity ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Dissection ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Nodal Yield

AbstractBackground:Nodal metastasis is an important prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. This study aimed to determine the average nodal basin yield per level of neck dissection, and to investigate if age, gender, body mass index, tumour size, depth of tumour invasion and p16 status influence nodal yield.Method:A retrospective review of 185 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma generated 240 neck dissection specimens.Results:The respective mean nodal yields for levels I, II, III, IV and V were 5.27, 9.43, 8.49, 7.43 and 9.02 in non-cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma patients, and 4.2, 7.57, 9.65, 4.33 and 12.29 in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma patients. Multiple regression analysis revealed that p16-positive patients with mucosal squamous cell carcinoma yielded, on average, 2.4 more nodes than their p16-negative peers (p = 0.04, 95 per cent confidence interval = 0.116 to 4.693). This figure was 3.84 (p = 0.008, 95 per cent confidence interval = 1.070 to 6.605) for p16-positive patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.Conclusion:In mucosal squamous cell carcinoma, p16-positive status significantly influenced nodal yield, with the impact being more pronounced in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document