scholarly journals Direct anterior approach vs. SuperPATH vs. conventional approaches in total hip replacement: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2021 ◽  
pp. 103058
Author(s):  
Nikolai Ramadanov ◽  
Simon Bueschges ◽  
Kuiliang Liu ◽  
Philip Lazaru ◽  
Ivan Marintschev
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Direct Anterior Approach ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Systematic Review of Radiological Analysis of Total Hip Replacement via Direct Anterior Approach in Comparison to Other Approaches – Study Protocol

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bartosz Maciąg ◽  
Kuba Radzimowski ◽  
Piotr Stępiński ◽  
Jakub Szymczak ◽  
Tomasz Albrewczyński ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
Direct Anterior Approach ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Radiological Analysis

Abstract Background Total hip arthroplasty (THR) is considered as the most effective available method of treatment of end-stage hip osteoarthritis (OA). This surgery can be performed via many different approaches. One of the newly developed technique is called direct anterior approach (DAA). It gains popularity and recognition as the least traumatic to the soft tissues, thus quickening rehabilitation and improving joint stability in the early postoperative period. There are no systematic reviews covering this subject in terms of potential differences in radiological prosthesis placement, and while there is still unsatisfactory evidence concerning long-term outcomes of DAA, such review may prove useful in the debate. The objective of our study was to systematically collect and review available data from randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) regarding radiographic assessment of prosthesis placement after total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach compared to other common approaches.Methods A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) will be conducted. SciFinder, Scopus, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Embase, Clinical Key and The Cochrane Library databases will be searched without restriction to date up to June 2020. Primary outcomes will include measurements related with the radiological analysis of trials comparing use of DAA to other approaches used for THR, containing at least two of the following: femoral stem alignment, mean radiographic cup inclination, mean radiographic cup anteversion, mean radiographic cup abduction, position in Lewinnek's safe zone. Study selection will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and the methodological appraisal of the studies will be assessed by the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for RCTs. Discussion This systematic review will provide missing information regarding influence of differences between DAA and other surgical approaches in total hip replacement on prosthesis implants placement in case of femoral stem and cup. This may result in improving knowledge and awareness of surgeons, improving patients satisfaction and functional outcome and lowering the risk of hip dislocations and other complications. Trial registration International Registration of Systematic reviews (PROSPERO) number CRD42019122675

scholarly journals Systematic Review of Radiological Analysis of Total Hip Replacement Via Direct Anterior Approach in Comparison to Other Approaches – Study Protocol

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bartosz Maciąg ◽  
Kuba Radzimowski ◽  
Piotr Stępiński ◽  
Jakub Szymczak ◽  
Tomasz Albrewczyński ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
Direct Anterior Approach ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Radiological Analysis

Abstract BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THR) is considered as the most effective available method of treatment of end-stage hip osteoarthritis (OA). This surgery can be performed via many different approaches. One of the newly developed technique is called direct anterior approach (DAA). It gains popularity and recognition as the least traumatic to the soft tissues, thus quickening rehabilitation and improving joint stability in the early postoperative period. There are no systematic reviews covering this subject in terms of potential differences in radiological prosthesis placement, and while there is still unsatisfactory evidence concerning long-term outcomes of DAA, such review may prove useful in the debate. The objective of our study was to systematically collect and review available data from randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) regarding radiographic assessment of prosthesis placement after total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach compared to other common approaches.MethodsA systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) will be conducted. SciFinder, Scopus, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Embase, Clinical Key and The Cochrane Library databases will be searched without restriction to date up to June 2020. Primary outcomes will include measurements related with the radiological analysis of trials comparing use of DAA to other approaches used for THR, containing at least two of the following: femoral stem alignment, mean radiographic cup inclination, mean radiographic cup anteversion, mean radiographic cup abduction, position in Lewinnek's safe zone. Study selection will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and the methodological appraisal of the studies will be assessed by the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for RCTs. DiscussionThis systematic review will provide missing information regarding influence of differences between DAA and other surgical approaches in total hip replacement on prosthesis implants placement in case of femoral stem and cup. This may result in improving knowledge and awareness of surgeons, improving patients satisfaction and functional outcome and lowering the risk of hip dislocations and other complications. Trial registrationInternational Registration of Systematic reviews (PROSPERO) numberCRD42019122675

Prostheses for Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Critical Appraisal of the Literature

1995 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 770-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delma E. Cowley
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Randomized Controlled

AbstractEighty-one published papers on the performance of prostheses in total hip replacement were appraised. Sound methodology was demonstrated in 1 of 8 randomized controlled trials and 4 of 17 nonrandomized comparative studies. Of 56 case series without controls, 32 met the appraisal criteria, but these are intrinsically less useful. The published literature does not provide solid evidence for the superiority of cement-free or hybrid prostheses over modern cemented types.

scholarly journals The Influence of Body Mass Index and Hip Anatomy on Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Replacement

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 555-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weilin Sang ◽  
Libo Zhu ◽  
Jinzhong Ma ◽  
Haiming Lu ◽  
Cong Wang
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Direct Anterior Approach ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Hip Anatomy

scholarly journals Post-Operative Auto-Transfusion in Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e55073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao Haien ◽  
Jiang Yong ◽  
Ma Baoan ◽  
Guo Mingjun ◽  
Fan Qingyu
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Randomized Controlled
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document