Massive Hemorrhagic Stroke After Administration of a Local Intraoral Anesthetic Solution During a Routine Dental Procedure: A Case Report

PM&R ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. S252-S252
Author(s):  
Jackson Liu
2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-336
Author(s):  
Marco Cicciù ◽  
Giovanni Battista Grossi ◽  
Mario Beretta ◽  
Davide Farronato ◽  
Concetta Scalfaro ◽  
...  

Aim: To report the clinical case of a child with facial and periorbital emphysema caused by an orthodontic device. Case report: An 11-year-old child presented to our clinic showing moderate swelling of the left facial area. Based on his dental history, physical findings, and instrument examinations, the diagnosis of cervicofacial emphysema was established, caused by disengagement of the facebow. One week later, all swelling and crepitus had disappeared without complications. Most patients who develop subcutaneous emphysema after a dental procedure have only moderate local swelling, which normally resolves spontaneously and without complications within a week. However, the spread of large amounts of air into the deeper spaces may cause life-threatening sequelae. Conclusions: Orthodontists should be aware that the use of extraoral traction applied via a facebow can cause soft tissue injures and emphysema of the cervicofacial region. It is important to avoid misdiagnosis and to appropriately inform patient and parents about this condition.


Author(s):  
M. Zas ◽  
M.O. Mendaro ◽  
P.V. Schiantarelli ◽  
M.I. Cotic ◽  
P.A. Chiaradía

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
Jin Kyu Yang ◽  
Jong Bum Park ◽  
So Young Joo ◽  
Deog Young Kim

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 2026-2030
Author(s):  
Teng‐bin Shi ◽  
Xin‐yu Fang ◽  
Chao‐xin Wang ◽  
Yuan‐qing Cai ◽  
Wen‐bo Li ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-127
Author(s):  
Srijana Basnet ◽  
Laxman Shrestha ◽  
Daman Raj Poudel

Peripheral eosinophilia is commonly encountered in our clinical practice. In this case report, we present a child who presented with hemorrhagic stroke and was finally diagnosed of eosinophilic meningitis. In this case report, we also propose probable etiologic agent.


Toxicon ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. 6-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Beatriz Temoteo Delgado ◽  
Caio Cesar Vaz Lacet Gondim ◽  
Lucas Pereira Reichert ◽  
Pedro Hugo Vieira da Silva ◽  
Rodrigo Marmo da Costa e Souza ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Dr Kamal Lochan Behera ◽  
◽  
Dr Samir Kumar Panda ◽  
Y Aiswarya Y Aiswarya

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keerthana Kunaparaju ◽  
Karthik Shetty ◽  
Vinod Jathanna ◽  
Kartik Nath ◽  
Roma M

Abstract Background Accidental ingestion of a dental bur during the dental procedure is a rare, but a potentially serious complication. Early recognition and foreign body retrieval is essential to prevent adverse patient outcomes. Case presentation A 76-year old male patient, presented to the department with a chief complaint of sensitivity in his upper right back tooth due to attrition. After assessing the pulp status, root canal therapy was planned for the tooth. During the procedure, it was noticed that the dental bur slipped out of the hand piece and the patient had accidentally ingested it. The patient was conscious and had no trouble while breathing at the time of ingestion of the bur although he had mild cough which lasted for a short duration. The dental procedure was aborted immediately and the patient was taken to the hospital for emergency care. The presence and location of the dental bur was confirmed using chest and abdominal x-rays and it was subsequently retrieved by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) procedure under general anaesthesia on the same day as a part of the emergency procedure. The analysis of this case reaffirms the importance of the use of physical barriers such as rubber dams and gauze screens as precautionary measures to prevent such incidents from occurring. Conclusion Ingestion of instruments are uncertain and hazardous complications to encounter during a dental procedure. The need for physical barrier like rubber dam is mandatory for all dental procedures. However, the dentist should be well trained to handle such medical emergencies and reassure the patient by taking them into confidence. Each incident encountered should be thoroughly documented to supply adequate guidance for treatment aspects. This would fulfil the professional responsibilities of the dentist/ clinician and may help avoid possible legal and ethical issues. This case report emphasizes on the need for the usage of physical barriers during dental procedures in order to avoid medical emergencies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document