Terminal velocity and drag coefficient for spherical particles

Author(s):  
Haim Kalman ◽  
Erez Matana
1990 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 403-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miloslav Hartman ◽  
Václav Veselý ◽  
Karel Svoboda ◽  
Vladimír Havlín

The Turton-Levenspiel correlation for the drag coefficient of a sphere is employed to compare recently proposed explicit equations to predict the free-fall conditions. Predictions of four different expressions are explored over a wide range of Archimedes number.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silin Jing ◽  
Xianzhi Song ◽  
Zhaopeng Zhu ◽  
Buwen Yu ◽  
Shiming Duan

Abstract Accurate description of cuttings slippage in the gas-liquid phase is of great significance for wellbore cleaning and the control accuracy of bottom hole pressure during MPD. In this study, the wellbore bubble flow environment was simulated by a constant pressure air pump and the transparent wellbore, and the settling characteristics of spherical particles under different gas volume concentrations were recorded and analyzed by highspeed photography. A total of 225 tests were conducted to analyze the influence of particle diameter (1–12mm), particle density (2700–7860kg/m^3), liquid viscosity and bubble volume concentration on particle settling velocity. Gas drag force is defined to quantitatively evaluate the bubble’s resistance to particle slippage. The relationship between bubble drag coefficient and particle Reynolds number is obtained by fitting the experimental results. An explicit settling velocity equation is established by introducing Archimedes number. This explicit equation with an average relative error of only 8.09% can directly predict the terminal settling velocity of the sphere in bubble containing Newtonian fluids. The models for predicting bubble drag coefficient and the terminal settling velocity are valid with particle Reynolds number ranging from 0.05 to 167 and bubble volume concentration ranging from 3.0% to 20.0%. Besides, a trial-and-error procedure and an illustrative example are presented to show how to calculate bubble drag coefficient and settling velocity in bubble containing fluids. The results of this study will provide the theoretical basis for wellbore cleaning and accurate downhole pressure to further improve the performance of MPD in treating gas influx.


Author(s):  
Kuniomi ASAKURA ◽  
Nobuo TAKEUCHI ◽  
Yoshiteru WATANABE

AIAA Journal ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 573-574
Author(s):  
FREDERICK L. SCHUYLER

AIAA Journal ◽  
1968 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. P. SELBERG ◽  
J. A. NICHOLLS

Author(s):  
Joseph P. Holland ◽  
Yesenia Tanner ◽  
Phillip A. Schinetsky ◽  
Semih Olcmen ◽  
Stanley Jones

In the current study, a rigid body penetrator nose shape that is optimized for minimum penetration drag [1] has been tested to determine the aerodynamic drag of such a penetrator in comparison to three additional nose shapes. Other nose shapes tested were an ogive cylinder, a 3/4 power series nose, and a standard cone. Fineness ratio for the studied nose geometries was chosen as l/d = 1 to maximize variation of the aerodynamic drag forces acting on the nose shapes. This paper discusses the measurements carried out in the University of Alabama’s 6″ × 6″ supersonic wind tunnel, using a 4 component force balance system. In separate experiments, drop tests were made in a viscous fluid to determine the skin-friction effects on these nose shapes. Supersonic wind-tunnel experiments were performed on each of the nose shapes at nine different Mach numbers ranging from 2 to 3.65. Results show that the nose shape optimized for penetration has the lowest drag coefficient of all the shapes at each Mach number within an uncertainty of 5.75%. In the viscous flow drop-test experiments, each nose shape was dropped from rest through water and then separately through viscous fluid (Nu-Calgon vacuum pump oil) under freefall conditions. Each drop was recorded via videotape, and the video was then analyzed to find the terminal velocity of each individual nose shape. Using classical dynamics equations, the weight, buoyant force, and experimentally determined terminal velocity are used to determine the drag force applied to each nose cone shape. Results indicate that while the optimal shape has a lesser drag coefficient than tangent ogive and the cone, the 3/4 power series shape is observed to have the least drag coefficient. In addition to the experiments performed, results on further investigation of the optimal nose shape for penetration are presented. The nose shape has been split into a series of line segments, and a program written has been utilized to search through numerical space for the combination of line segment slopes that produces the nose geometry with the lowest nose shape factor. The results of the numerical analysis in this study point to a different nose shape than the “optimal nose” shape tested in the current study.


2019 ◽  
Vol 117 ◽  
pp. 130-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thamali R. Jayawickrama ◽  
Nils Erland L. Haugen ◽  
Matthaus U. Babler ◽  
M.A. Chishty ◽  
Kentaro Umeki

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document