scholarly journals Project Delivery Methods in Large Public Road Projects – A Case Study of E6 Jaktøyen - Sentervegen

2017 ◽  
Vol 196 ◽  
pp. 391-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Haugen ◽  
Paulos Abebe Wondimu ◽  
Jardar Lohne ◽  
Ola Lædre
Keyword(s):  
Project Delivery ◽  
Delivery Methods ◽  
Public Road ◽  
Project Delivery Methods ◽  
Road Projects

Analysis of Risk and Reliability in Project Delivery Methods

2015 ◽  
pp. 612-622
Author(s):  
Robert Schultz ◽  
Ahmad Sarfaraz ◽  
Kouroush Jenab
Keyword(s):  
Construction Projects ◽  
Financial Risk ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Project Delivery ◽  
Delivery Methods ◽  
Project Delivery Methods ◽  
Early Design Stages ◽  
Main Factors ◽  
Improve Reliability

Risk and reliability are two main factors that must be studied in order to measure the successful rate of a project. As a result, innovative project delivery methods have been proposed to mitigate the risk and improve reliability of a project. The intent of this study is to compare the use of the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) and fuzzy AHP for decisions surrounding the early stages of construction projects based on risk and reliability measures. Financial risk is especially high during the early design stages of a project due to the unknown obstacles that will follow. The case study uses the selection of a project delivery method as an example, and provides a sample project to highlight the project-specific variability of the multi-criteria decision analysis.

Analysis of Risk and Reliability in Project Delivery Methods

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 54-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Schultz ◽  
Ahmad Sarfaraz ◽  
Kouroush Jenab
Keyword(s):  
Construction Projects ◽  
Financial Risk ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Project Delivery ◽  
Delivery Methods ◽  
Project Delivery Methods ◽  
Early Design Stages ◽  
Improve Reliability ◽  
Selection Of

Risk and reliability are two main factors that must be studied in order to measure the successful rate of a project. As a result, innovative project delivery methods have been proposed to mitigate the risk and improve reliability of a project. The intent of this study is to compare the use of the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) and fuzzy AHP for decisions surrounding the early stages of construction projects based on risk and reliability measures. Financial risk is especially high during the early design stages of a project due to the unknown obstacles that will follow. The case study uses the selection of a project delivery method as an example, and provides a sample project to highlight the project-specific variability of the multi-criteria decision analysis.

scholarly journals Post-Disaster Infrastructure Delivery for Resilience

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 3458
Author(s):  
Mikhail Chester ◽  
Mounir El Asmar ◽  
Samantha Hayes ◽  
Cheryl Desha
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effective ◽  
Project Delivery ◽  
Delivery Methods ◽  
Project Delivery Methods ◽  
Alternative Project Delivery Methods ◽  
Resilient Infrastructure ◽  
Alternative Project Delivery ◽  
Innovative Contracting ◽  
Alternative Delivery ◽  
Post Disaster

As climate change increases the frequency and intensity of disasters and associated infrastructure damage, Alternative Project Delivery Methods are well positioned to enable innovative contracting and partnering methods for designing and delivering adaptation solutions that are more time- and cost-effective. However, where conventional “build-back-as-before” post-disaster reconstruction occurs, communities remain vulnerable to future disasters of similar or greater magnitude. In this conceptual paper, we draw on a variety of literature and emergent practices to present how such alternative delivery methods of reconstruction projects can systematically integrate “build-back-better” and introduce more resilient infrastructure outcomes. Considering existing knowledge regarding infrastructure resilience, post-disaster reconstruction and project delivery methods, we consider the resilience regimes of rebound, robustness, graceful extensibility, and sustained adaptability to present the potential for alternative project delivery methods to improve the agility and flexibility of infrastructure against future climate-related and other hazards. We discuss the criticality of continued pursuit of stakeholder engagement to support further improvements to project delivery methods, enabling new opportunities for engaging with a broader set of stakeholders, and for stakeholders to contribute new knowledge and insights to the design process. We conclude the significant potential for such methods to enable resilient infrastructure outcomes, through prioritizing resilience alongside time and cost. We also present a visual schematic in the form of a framework for enabling post-disaster infrastructure delivery for resilience outcomes, across different scales and timeframes of reconstruction. The findings have immediate implications for agencies managing disaster recovery efforts, offering decision-support for improving the adaptive capacity of infrastructure, the services they deliver, and capacities of the communities that rely on them.

Project delivery methods in European social housing energy renovations

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadeo Baldiri Salcedo Rahola ◽  
Ad Straub
Keyword(s):  
Social Housing ◽  
Project Delivery ◽  
Delivery Methods ◽  
Project Delivery Methods
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document