The impact of adjuvant radiation therapy on survival in women with uterine carcinosarcoma

2008 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Clayton Smith ◽  
O. Kenneth Macdonald ◽  
David K. Gaffney
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 91-91
Author(s):  
Sarah Patricia Cate ◽  
Alyssa Gillego ◽  
Manjeet Chadha ◽  
John Rescigno ◽  
Paul R. Gliedman ◽  
...  

91 Background: The Oncotype Dx DCIS Score has been developed and validated for risk recurrence in ductal carcinoma in situ. It is a 12 gene assay performed on an individual patient’s tumor. The results give information about the 10 year risk of any in-breast event and the 10 year risk of an invasive breast cancer. The clinical validation study was based on patients enrolled in ECOG 5194. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the impact of the DCIS Score on recommendations for adjuvant radiation therapy. Methods: In this IRB approved study, 27 patients at our institution underwent evaluation with the DCIS Score from April 2012 to February 2013. All patients had specimens submitted for DCIS Scores. 14 patients had margins of 3 mm or greater. 12 patients had margins of 1 mm to 2.5 mm, and 1 patient had margins that were less than 1 mm from the DCIS. The mean age was 56.8 years, with a range of 40-79 years old. The DCIS Score is reported on a scale of 0-100. All patients underwent consultation with radiation oncology. The radiation oncologists formulated their preliminary recommendation prior to reviewing the patients’ DCIS Scores. The final recommendation for radiation treatment was rendered after reviewing the DCIS Score. We then compared the pre-DCIS Score and post-DCIS score treatment recommendations. Results: 21 patients (78%) were advised to have adjuvant radiation therapy. 6 patients (22%) were advised not to undergo adjuvant radiation based on their clinical and pathologic features. Although the DCIS Score did not change treatment recommendations for any patient in this study group, it did confirm initial treatment recommendations. For the patients who were advised not to have radiation, their DCIS Scores were 0-31. Conclusions: The DCIS Score is a validated tool to assess the local risk of recurrence for ductal carcinoma in situ. In our study population, the results of the DCIS Score did not alter treatment in any patient. It is important to note that in the 6 patients who were advised not to have radiation, the low DCIS Score confirmed the radiation oncologist’s perceived low risk of recurrence. In order to increase confidence in results of the DCIS Score, further studies need to be performed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 628-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehran Yusuf ◽  
Jeremy Gaskins ◽  
Emma Trawick ◽  
Paul Tennant ◽  
Jeffrey Bumpous ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective(s) To identify predictors for receiving adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) and investigate the impact of adjuvant RT on survival for patients with resected primary tracheal carcinoma (PTC). Methods The National Cancer database was queried for patients with PTC diagnosed from 2004 to 2014 undergoing resection. Patients who died within 30 days of resection were excluded to minimize immortal time bias. Kaplan–Meier methods, Cox regression modeling and propensity score weighted (PSW) log-rank tests were considered to assess the relationship between adjuvant RT and overall survival (OS). Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors associated with receiving adjuvant RT. Results A total of 549 patients were identified with 300 patients (55%) receiving adjuvant RT. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was the most common histology with 234 patients (43%). Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) was second most frequent with 180 patients (33%). Adjuvant RT was not associated with OS by multivariable Cox analysis or PSW log-rank test (P values > 0.05). Patients with positive surgical margins (odds ratio (OR) 1.80, confidence interval (CI) 1.06–3.07) were more likely to receive adjuvant RT than those with negative surgical margins. Patients with ACC (OR 6.53, CI 3.57–11.95) were more likely to receive adjuvant RT compared with SCC. Conclusions Adjuvant RT was not significantly associated with OS for patients with resected PTC in this analysis. Surgical margin status and tumor histology were associated with receiving adjuvant RT. Further investigations including prospective registry studies capturing radiation technique and treatment volumes are needed to better define which patients with resected PTC may benefit from adjuvant RT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document