scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of respiratory-gated and ungated FDG-PET for target volume definition in radiotherapy treatment planning for pancreatic cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 120 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Kishi ◽  
Yukinori Matsuo ◽  
Akira Nakamura ◽  
Yuji Nakamoto ◽  
Satoshi Itasaka ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. S305
Author(s):  
E. Serup-Hansen ◽  
H. Westergreen Hendel ◽  
H. Hjorth Johannesen ◽  
W. Ottosson ◽  
B. Kristensen ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aswin L. Hoffmann ◽  
Jorn A. van Dalen ◽  
John Lee ◽  
Vincent Grégoire ◽  
Wim J.G. Oyen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-346
Author(s):  
Auwal Abubakar ◽  
Adamu D. Bojude ◽  
Aminu U. Usman ◽  
Idris Garba ◽  
Abasiama D. Obotiba ◽  
...  

AbstractPurposeThe aim of this study is to establish clinical evidence regarding the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in target volume definition for radiotherapy treatment planning of brain tumours.MethodsPrimary studies were systematically retrieved from six electronic databases and other sources. Studies included were only those that quantitatively compared computed tomography (CT) and MRI in target volume definition for radiotherapy of brain tumours. Study characteristics and quality were assessed and the data were extracted from eligible studies. Effect estimates for each study was computed as mean percentage difference based on individual patient data where available. The included studies were then combined in meta-analysis using Review Manager (RevMan) software version 5.0.ResultFive studies with a total number of 72 patients were included in this review. The quality of the studies was rated strong. The percentages mean differences of the studies were 7·47, 11·36, 30·70, 41·69 and −24·6% using CT as the baseline. The result of statistical analysis showed small-to-moderate heterogeneity; τ2=36·8; χ2=6·23; df=4 (p=0·18); I2=36%. The overall effect estimate was −1·85 [95% confidence interval (CI); −7·24, 10·94], Z=0·40 (p=0·069>0·5).ConclusionBrain tumour volumes measured using MRI-based method for radiotherapy treatment planning were larger compared with CT defined volumes but the difference lacks statistical significance.


2006 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bernard Davis ◽  
Beatrice Reiner ◽  
Marius Huser ◽  
Cyrill Burger ◽  
Gábor Székely ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 143-145
Author(s):  
Igor Ðan ◽  
Borislava Petrovic ◽  
Marko Erak ◽  
Silvija Lucic ◽  
Ivan Nikolic ◽  
...  

The best option for treatment of anal cancer is chemoirradiation. FDG-PET detects the primary tumor and metastatic involved lymph nodes better and more frequently than CT only. During last decade, fusion of different imaging modalities became important factor in radiotherapy treatment planning. Patient was diagnosed for squamous cell carcinoma by colonoscopy and FDG/PET followed by histopathological confirmation. A precise determination of target volume is very important in radiotherapy. In recent years higher utilization of FDG-PET CT fusion in radiotherapy treatment planning of anal cancer is recorded. Image registration and fusion between CT for radiotherapy treatment planning and FDG PET can help better visualization and especially in the determination of boost target volume. We observed much better detection of affected lymphatics by the data obtained by image co-registration of PET and CT data. This fact allowed us to increase dose prescribed to tumor and affected lymph nodes. PET is very important imaging modality for patients with anal canal cancer. FDG-PET has proved to be important tool for the radiotherapy treatment planning of anal canal carcinoma


2011 ◽  
Vol 84 (1006) ◽  
pp. 919-929 ◽  
Author(s):  
G G Hanna ◽  
J R Van Sörnsen De Koste ◽  
K J Carson ◽  
J M O'Sullivan ◽  
A R Hounsell ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. S1071
Author(s):  
R. Autorino ◽  
V. Lancellotta ◽  
M. Campitelli ◽  
A. Nardangeli ◽  
M.G. Ferrandina ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Dietl ◽  
Jörg Marienhagen ◽  
Thomas Kühnel ◽  
Christof Schaefer ◽  
Oliver Kölbl

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
A. Stefano ◽  
S. Vitabile ◽  
G. Russo ◽  
D. D'Urso ◽  
M. Ippolito ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document