:
Despite advances in early reperfusion and a technologic renaissance in the space of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), cardiogenic shock (CS) remains the leading cause of in-hospital mortality following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Given the challenges inherent to conducting adequately powered randomized controlled trials in this time-sensitive, hemodynamically complex, and highly lethal syndrome, treatment recommendations have been derived from AMI patient without shock.
In this review, we aimed to (1) examine the pathophysiology and the new classification system for CS; (2) provide a comprehensive evidence-based review for best practices for interventional management of AMI-CS in the cardiac catheterization laboratory; and (3) highlight the concept of how frailty and geriatric syndromes can be integrated in the decision process and where medical futility lies in the spectrum of AMI-CS care. Management strategies in the cardiac catheterization laboratory for CS include optimal vascular access, periprocedural antithrombotic therapy, culprit lesion versus multi-vessel revascularization, selective utilization of hemodynamic MCS tailored to individual shock hemometabolic profiles, and management of cardiac arrest.
Efforts to advance clinical evidence for patients with CS should be concentrated on (1) the coordination of multi-center registries; (2) development of pragmatic clinical trial designed to evaluate innovative therapies; (3) establishment of multidisciplinary care models that will inform quality care and improve clinical outcomes.
Mechanical Circulatory Support in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory for Cardiogenic Shock
