Use of ondansetron during pregnancy and the risk of major congenital malformations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuf Cem Kaplan ◽  
Jonathan Luke Richardson ◽  
Elif Keskin-Arslan ◽  
Hilal Erol-Coskun ◽  
Debra Kennedy
2017 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 203-204
Author(s):  
Yusuf C. Kaplan ◽  
Jonathan L. Richardson ◽  
Elif Keskin-Arslan ◽  
Hilal Erol-Coskun ◽  
Debra Kennedy

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e0257584
Author(s):  
Li Sun ◽  
Yang Xi ◽  
Xiaoke Wen ◽  
Wei Zou

Background Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy affects up to 80% of pregnant women, it typically occurs during the first trimester which is the most sensitive time for environmental exposures given organogenesis. Metoclopramide is an antiemetic drug used widely during NVP, but the findings of studies evaluating its safety of use in pregnancy is inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether metoclopramide use during first trimester of pregnancy is associated with the risk of major congenital malformations. Methods The systematic search using database included Pubmed, Embase, Web of science, and Cochrane library. Studies written in English, comprising with an exposed group and a control group, reporting major congenital malformation as an outcome were included. Results Six studies assessing a total number of 33374 metoclopramide-exposed and 373498 controls infants were included in this meta-analysis. No significant increase in the rate of major congenital malformation was detected following metoclopramide use during first trimester (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.93–1.38). Conclusions Metoclopramide use during first trimester of pregnancy was not associated with the risk of major congenital malformations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1001-1010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Turner ◽  
Matthew Jones ◽  
Luis R Vaz ◽  
Tim Coleman

AbstractIntroductionSmoking in pregnancy is a substantial public health issue, but, apart from nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), pharmacological therapies are not generally used to promote cessation. Bupropion and varenicline are effective cessation methods in nonpregnant smokers and this systematic review investigates their safety in pregnancy.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsychINFO databases for studies of any design reporting pregnancy outcomes after bupropion or varenicline exposure. We included studies of bupropion used for smoking cessation, depression, or where the indication was unspecified. Depending on study design, quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Most findings are reported narratively but meta-analyses were used to produce pooled estimates for the proportion of live births with congenital malformations and of the mean birthweight and gestational age at delivery following bupropion exposure.ResultsIn total, 18 studies were included: 2 randomized controlled trials, 11 cohorts, 2 case– control studies, and 3 case reports. Study quality was variable. Gestational safety outcomes were reported in 14 bupropion and 4 varenicline studies. Meaningful meta-analysis was only possible for bupropion exposure, for which the pooled estimated proportion of congenital malformations amongst live-born infants was 1.0% (95% CI = 0.0%–3.0%, I2 = 80.9%, 4 studies) and the mean birthweight and mean gestational age at delivery was 3305.9 g (95% CI = 3173.2–3438.7 g, I2 = 77.6%, 5 studies) and 39.2 weeks (95% CI = 38.8–39.6 weeks, I2 = 69.9%, 5 studies), respectively.ConclusionsThere was no strong evidence that either major positive or negative outcomes were associated with gestational use of bupropion or varenicline. PROSPERO registration number CRD42017067064.ImplicationsWe believe this to be the first systematic review investigating the safety of bupropion and varenicline in pregnancy. Meta-analysis of outcomes following bupropion exposure in pregnancy suggests that there are no major positive or negative impacts on the rate of congenital abnormalities, birthweight, or premature birth. Overall, we found no evidence that either of these treatments might be harmful in pregnancy, and no strong evidence to suggest safety, but available evidence is of poor quality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document