scholarly journals Cardiac movement identified on focused cardiac ultrasound and resuscitation outcome in non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Resuscitation ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. e85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nalinas Khunkhlai ◽  
Kanjana Koydul ◽  
Pairoj Khruekarnchana
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-31
Author(s):  
Nick Brown ◽  
Tom Quinn

Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) is emerging in emergency medical systems, particularly in the context of prognostication in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, FoCUS has not been formally incorporated into UK guidelines because of a lack of evidence. Furthermore, concerns have been raised that FoCUS can distract people from providing other essential and evidenced elements of care. This broad literature search aims to shed light on the practice of FoCUS in cardiac arrest by reviewing articles related to in-hospital and out-of-hospital practice. The findings are conspicuous by the lack of high-quality studies, particularly regarding prognostication. Association between ultrasound findings and outcome are asserted, as is the feasibility of paramedic use of FoCUS, although the evidence is from small and non-randomised studies and subject to bias.


2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. S153
Author(s):  
J.R. Balderston ◽  
A. You ◽  
D.P. Evans ◽  
L. Taylor ◽  
J. Joyce ◽  
...  

Resuscitation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 142 ◽  
pp. 16-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludvig Elfwén ◽  
Karin Hildebrand ◽  
Sofia Schierbeck ◽  
Martin Sundqvist ◽  
Mattias Ringh ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica R. Balderston ◽  
Alan X. You ◽  
David P. Evans ◽  
Lindsay A. Taylor ◽  
Zachary M. Gertz

Abstract Background Focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) can aid in evaluation and management of patients with cardiac arrest, but image quality in this population has been questioned. Our goal was to determine how often adequate imaging can be obtained in cardiac arrest patients. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study to examine the utility of FOCUS in cardiac arrest. All patients who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) in cardiac arrest or who had cardiac arrest while in the ED over 6 months were prospectively identified. FOCUS images were obtained as part of routine clinical care. Patients with images obtained were paired with age- and gender-matched controls who underwent FOCUS for another indication during the study period. Image quality was scored by two blinded reviewers using a 0–4 scale, with a score of ≥ 2 considered adequate. Results There were 137 consecutive cardiac arrests, 121 out-of-hospital and 16 in-hospital, during the study period. FOCUS images were recorded in 126 (92%), who were included in the analysis. The average age was 58 years, and 45% were female. Ninety-seven studies (77%) were obtained during advanced cardiac life support while 29 (23%) were obtained after return of spontaneous circulation. The controls were appropriately matched. Of the cardiac arrest studies, 106 (84%) were rated adequate, compared to 116 (92%) in controls (p = 0.08). When compared to control FOCUS studies, the scores given to studies of cardiac arrest patients were lower (p = 0.001). Conclusions FOCUS can reliably be used during cardiac arrest to obtain images adequate to answer clinical questions and guide therapies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document